Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Proposal\s+for\s+vintage\-oriented\s+autocross\s+class\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Proposal\s+for\s+vintage\-oriented\s+autocross\s+class\.\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Proposal for vintage-oriented autocross class. (score: 1): Author: GRMPer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 12:06:40 EST; Here's a copy of something I just sent to the SEB. It's a proposal for a regional-optional vintage autocross class. Dear SEB, Grassroots Motorsports has long been a supporter of the national Solo II; /html/autox/2003-03/msg00173.html (11,124 bytes)
2. Re: Proposal for vintage-oriented autocross class. (score: 1): Author: "Bruce Wentzel" <greendotracing@netzero.net>; Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 16:02:20 -0500; 69 to 73 Corvettes came stock with 8" wheels. You'd need soem language to handle that. The Under option 2 you'll have a tough time finding a tire to be adequate for a Corvette unless you consider a; /html/autox/2003-03/msg00175.html (9,257 bytes)
3. Re: Proposal for vintage-oriented autocross class. (score: 1): Author: "Rick Brown" <free2000@quixnet.net>; Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 13:21:12 -0800; Cal Club has had a regional Historic class for many years. Here's the rules for it: HISTORIC: (HST) Any category car, prepared in accordance with the SCCA Solo I and II Rules Book, with the following; /html/autox/2003-03/msg00176.html (13,664 bytes)
4. Re: Proposal for vintage-oriented autocross class. (score: 1): Author: "Scott M. Stone" <sstone@foo3.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 13:42:08 -0800 (PST); how about "no more than 1.5" wider than stock, period". wouldn't that solve it? why not just say "wheels no larger than 16" or 1" larger than stock, whichever is GREATER", then the corvette guys can; /html/autox/2003-03/msg00177.html (10,163 bytes)
5. Re: Proposal for vintage-oriented autocross class. (score: 1): Author: GRMPer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 16:45:35 EST; All of the feedback that I've been getting has been pretty positive. I threw the proposal out there for just this kind of serious look at it. Haven't been getting any, "that's stupid" always a good s; /html/autox/2003-03/msg00178.html (8,598 bytes)
6. Re: Proposal for vintage-oriented autocross class. (score: 1): Author: "Scott M. Stone" <sstone@foo3.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 13:50:09 -0800 (PST); it sounds like an interesting proposal. Wish I could run in it, but I don't think I could justify a 1993 Rx7 R1 as a "vintage" car yet :) -- Scott M. Stone <sstone@foo3.com> Cisco Certified Network A; /html/autox/2003-03/msg00179.html (9,013 bytes)
7. Re: Proposal for vintage-oriented autocross class. (score: 1): Author: "Bruce Wentzel" <greendotracing@netzero.net>; Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 17:17:32 -0500; Well, my beloved big fat Plastic cars still present some tire selection/availability problems when you go to 16". Heavy cars just need larger tires and choices are getting to be fewer all the time. W; /html/autox/2003-03/msg00180.html (11,393 bytes)
8. Re: Proposal for vintage-oriented autocross class. (score: 1): Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <knuckledragger@kcweb.net>; Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 23:27:24 -0600; One question, what "vintage" cars ever came with 16" wheels? So, why allow them? There's plenty of 15" rubber, including "vintage" rubber, available out there. Eric /// unsubscribe/change address req; /html/autox/2003-03/msg00183.html (8,576 bytes)
9. Re: Proposal for vintage-oriented autocross class. (score: 1): Author: "Rick Brown" <free2000@quixnet.net>; Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 00:05:22 -0800; Well, my sister's MG TC that I helped restore and got to drive periodically had 18" wheels, of course they were probably only 4 inches wide...... And they were very successful race cars in their time; /html/autox/2003-03/msg00184.html (8,975 bytes)
10. RE: Proposal for vintage-oriented autocross class. (score: 1): Author: "Robert D. LaMoreaux" <Rob_LaMoreaux@compuserve.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 11:51:17 -0500; Sounds like a cool idea, since I only autocross my Elan at the regional level and then just for the fun of it. On the tires I'd have to say DOT approved that fit under the fenders, since it is pretty; /html/autox/2003-03/msg00188.html (9,362 bytes)
11. re:Proposal for vintage-oriented autocross class. (score: 1): Author: "Ayer, John K" <john.k.ayer@boeing.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 16:38:00 -0800; Darn, it's another Digest Delayed Response. Are we still talking about Vintage? :-) This is very similar to our local Vintage class. And it's a terrific idea. We use the phrase "period correct" to li; /html/autox/2003-03/msg00196.html (11,737 bytes)
12. re:Proposal for vintage-oriented autocross class. (score: 1): Author: "Scott M. Stone" <sstone@foo3.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 17:24:31 -0800 (PST); bah, you should make an exception for the 1st gen Rx7s - they're every bit as "vintage" and "classic" as the 240/260Z... i've owned 5 Rx7s and 3 Z-cars, including a 1971 240Z, a 1979 Rx7, a 1982 Rx7,; /html/autox/2003-03/msg00197.html (9,774 bytes)
13. Re: Proposal for vintage-oriented autocross class. (score: 1): Author: Carson or Wendy <dammwood@shaw.ca>; Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 20:43:57 -0700; Regarding the wheels and tires thing. I don't think you will find any car that is older than 1973 to have anything resembling a good selection of competitive street tires regardless of what ever size; /html/autox/2003-03/msg00199.html (9,003 bytes)
14. Re: Proposal for vintage-oriented autocross class. (score: 1): Author: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 18:43:06 -0600; If you could rely on that, it would be the best thing about the class. Phil Ethier West Side Saint Paul Minnesota USA 1970 Lotus Europa 65/2597, 1992 Saturn SL2, 1986 Suburban, 1962 TR4 CT2846L pethi; /html/autox/2003-03/msg00207.html (8,945 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]