Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Protocol\s+on\s+the\s+FOT\s+List\.\.\.Website\s+activity\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Protocol on the FOT List...Website activity (score: 1)
Author: N197TR4@cs.com
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 16:45:05 EDT
Hello FOT, I am not being grumpy... We need to come up with some solutions about copying the whole list, where it largely concerns a small segment of the FOT list population. I developed a sub-group
/html/fot/2000-10/msg00056.html (8,547 bytes)

2. Re: Protocol on the FOT List...Website activity (score: 1)
Author: Richard Taylor <n196x@mindspring.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 17:34:57 -0400
"....in the spirit in which it was offered," if I recall correctly, it was in the form of a Manhattan...or was that Uncle Jack? Whatever you'all's spirits of choice were, they were alien to this Sou
/html/fot/2000-10/msg00059.html (9,742 bytes)

3. Re: Protocol on the FOT List...Website activity (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Kramer" <rgk@flash.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 16:50:54 -0500
Maybe we can all list the FOT email address in our address books like this: FOT: DO NOT COPY OR FORWARD OUTSIDE OF FOT LIST <fot@autox.team.net> Bob Kramer TR6, TR4A, TR4 Hill Country Triumph Club Co
/html/fot/2000-10/msg00060.html (9,782 bytes)

4. Re: Protocol on the FOT List...Website activity (score: 1)
Author: jmwagner <jmwagner@greenheart.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 18:41:20 -0700
Joe, FOT, et al, My feeling is that those posts you feel should be "avoided", are often ones that might be best routed to the regular Triumph news group.. FOT should definitely focus on racing... to
/html/fot/2000-10/msg00067.html (11,140 bytes)

5. Re: Protocol on the FOT List...Website activity (score: 1)
Author: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 19:16:27 -0700
I am rather curious about what it was that prompted Joe A's original post. It came at a time when there was much discussion regarding SCCA autocross rules. This makes me wonder if Joe is regarding th
/html/fot/2000-10/msg00069.html (9,051 bytes)

6. Re: Protocol on the FOT List...Website activity (score: 1)
Author: jmwagner <jmwagner@greenheart.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 19:37:16 -0700
Many, if not all, organizations find themselves having to step back, and re-focus on what brought them together in the first place. Joe A., purposely avoided being specific. He's just trying to nudg
/html/fot/2000-10/msg00070.html (10,673 bytes)

7. Re: Protocol on the FOT List...Website activity (score: 1)
Author: BillDentin@aol.com
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 10:23:50 EDT
<< But I was under the impression that FOT embraces all sorts of Triumph racing not just road racing. If I am wrong, I feel that this is rather an elitist attitude and I will gladly remove my presenc
/html/fot/2000-10/msg00075.html (8,792 bytes)

8. Re: Protocol on the FOT List...Website activity (score: 1)
Author: Richard Taylor <n196x@mindspring.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 11:08:22 -0400
I have Vintage raced for twenty years. A couple of years ago I took my street car, an old 911, to a local Autocross just to give the boys a lesson. The humiliation of the shellacking I got still burn
/html/fot/2000-10/msg00076.html (10,073 bytes)

9. Protocol on the FOT List...Website activity (score: 1)
Author: N197TR4@cs.com
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 12:10:49 EDT
Well, perhaps I just stepped in it. However, this should have never become an issue on Autocrossing. Nothing was said about Autocrossing until it was brought up as a response. There was no content i
/html/fot/2000-10/msg00077.html (10,116 bytes)

10. Re: Protocol on the FOT List...Website activity (score: 1)
Author: wiseman <wiseman@titan.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 12:19:13 -0400
Wow, after reading all these good words about autocrossing/ers it makes me want to go out this weekend and make all my launches in gear, and with the parking brake off ! John Wiseman TR6 FSP/NEOHIO
/html/fot/2000-10/msg00078.html (10,442 bytes)

11. Re: Protocol on the FOT List...Website activity (score: 1)
Author: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:19:25 -0700
I was hoping that would be your response. I was concerned because your post did not say what you were referring to and the only thing that was going on at the time was autocross rules. Thanks for cl
/html/fot/2000-10/msg00079.html (10,966 bytes)

12. Re: Protocol on the FOT List...Website activity (score: 1)
Author: "RIVERSIDE" <RIVERSIDE@Cedar-Rapids.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:13:16 -0500
it a disturbing the save are note offered. that manages the mail. You can search the archive of letters by thread and this is most useful, even if the thread may be of limited interest. There are are
/html/fot/2000-10/msg00080.html (9,760 bytes)

13. Protocol on the FOT List...Website activity (score: 1)
Author: "" <greenman62@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 18:47:48 GMT
Hey guys! I think all this fooforah has been healthy! As I remember it the FOT was founded on the basis that the formost rule was... there were no rules... I think our "saving grace" is our lack of o
/html/fot/2000-10/msg00081.html (9,194 bytes)

14. Protocol on the FOT List...Website activity (score: 1)
Author: Randall Young <ryoung@NAVCOMTECH.COM>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 13:53:01 -0700
Should be a relatively easy thing to sign FOT up with ListQuest. I note that Team-Thicko is already. The downside is that now anyone can read about what trick new parts you've used on your 'vintage'
/html/fot/2000-10/msg00084.html (8,360 bytes)

15. Re: Protocol on the FOT List...Website activity (score: 1)
Author: Rosspemlee@aol.com
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 18:44:51 EDT
Doug Ross
/html/fot/2000-10/msg00086.html (7,861 bytes)

16. Fw: Protocol on the FOT List...Website activity (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Richardson" <Paul-Richardson@cyberware.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 12:14:13 +0100
As a long time road racer, who ain't worth a crap at Solo or autocrossing, Hey Bill Didn't you win the 1999 Seniors Vintage Championship?? - Axle shafts may come and go, but in my humble opinion Dent
/html/fot/2000-10/msg00088.html (9,498 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu