Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Public\s+Access\s+To\s+FOT\s+Dialog\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Public\s+Access\s+To\s+FOT\s+Dialog\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Public Access To FOT Dialog (score: 1): Author: EISANDIEGO@aol.com; Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 14:43:52 EST; When doing a Google search today, I was surprised to find references to specific dialogs taking place within team.net archives. I am wondering how much of the FOT dialog is publicly available in the; /html/fot/2002-12/msg00262.html (7,722 bytes)
2. Re: Public Access To FOT Dialog (score: 1): Author: "" <greenman62@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 19:55:52 +0000; That sounds dangerously like "Lawyer Stuff"... GP Greg Petrolati Champaign, Illinois 1962 TR4 (CT4852L) That's not a leak... My car's just marking its territory... __________________________________; /html/fot/2002-12/msg00263.html (8,402 bytes)
3. Re: Public Access To FOT Dialog (score: 1): Author: Dave Riddle <dave@microworks.net>; Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 13:08:46 -0700; I can't help you with your first question, but I would think in regards to your second question that you would be protected (if you're here in the US) under the First Amendment as long as you what yo; /html/fot/2002-12/msg00264.html (8,442 bytes)
4. RE: Public Access To FOT Dialog (score: 1): Author: "Randall Young" <ryoung@navcomtech.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 12:40:44 -0800; MJB may have a better idea, but I believe the answer is "most of it". A quick Google on 'cary perket fot' turned up 6 matches from the FOT archives ... IMHO, you should avoid 'ad hominem' attacks an; /html/fot/2002-12/msg00265.html (9,020 bytes)
5. RE: Public Access To FOT Dialog (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 14:12:16 -0800; Actually the bar is not very high for either libel or slander--someone simply has to want to take action. In essence you can sue anyone for anything. You probably will not prevail unless your case is; /html/fot/2002-12/msg00268.html (9,858 bytes)
6. RE: Public Access To FOT Dialog (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 22:21:16 -0800; Aha! I knew it. Actually as soon as I read your post I knew the pro from Dover had arrived. Truth is a defense but it's never assumed. I think we'd be better off with a legal system based on fist fig; /html/fot/2002-12/msg00271.html (10,989 bytes)
7. Re: Public Access To FOT Dialog (score: 1): Author: "Kas Kastner" <kaskas@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 22:32:52 -0800; If you threaten to sue, I suggest also, you don't go alone to the parking; /html/fot/2002-12/msg00272.html (12,288 bytes)
8. Re: Public Access To FOT Dialog (score: 1): Author: TeriAnn Wakeman <twakeman@cruzers.com>; Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 05:30:36 -0800; Aren't people pursuing a hypothetical question just a tad far? I thought the whole reason people were on this list was to share knowledge and experiences about Triumphs; to help each other go a littl; /html/fot/2002-12/msg00273.html (8,402 bytes)
9. Re: Public Access To FOT Dialog (score: 1): Author: "Bill Sohl" <billsohl@mindspring.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 00:05:24 -0500; references how The question is best answered by Mark Bradakis (away for a few days I think from reading a post to that effect the other day). The safest thing is to give your OPINION only unless you; /html/fot/2002-12/msg00281.html (9,686 bytes)
10. RE: Public Access To FOT Dialog (score: 1): Author: "Brad Eells" <bradlnss@lightspeed.net>; Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 22:00:04 -0800; Wow...you must have been standing next to Al Gore when he invented the Internet! (just an opinion, not a statement of fact...) ;-) Brad << just personal reflections on almost 20 years of internet usa; /html/fot/2002-12/msg00282.html (7,570 bytes)
11. Re: Public Access To FOT Dialog (score: 1): Author: "Bill Sohl" <billsohl@mindspring.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 11:55:52 -0500; Yea, I don"t remember ever seeing ole Al. I seem to recall being on the British-Cars email group about 1985 or so. But then my memory could easily be suspect :-) Cheers and Happy New Year to all. Bil; /html/fot/2002-12/msg00284.html (8,190 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]