Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Question\s+for\s+rear\s+end\s+experts\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Question\s+for\s+rear\s+end\s+experts\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Question for rear end experts (score: 1): Author: "Ed Esslinger" <edstiger@snowhill.com>; Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 08:38:54 +0100; I'm Confused -- My work shop manual (WSM-145 page 23) indicates that the standard 1725 Alpine has a 3.89 rear end, with overdrive it's 4.22. On page 15 Road speed /Engine speed there is an indication; /html/alpines/2001-06/msg00203.html (7,425 bytes)
2. Re: Question for rear end experts (score: 1): Author: Jeff Howarth <jeff@v8tiger.demon.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 16:08:09 +0100; Hi Ed, most LRX cars series 4 and 5 seem to have the 4.22 ratio. I guess it was for stop light racing !! The over drive standard set up is with a 4.22 and you will notice the big difference in engine; /html/alpines/2001-06/msg00210.html (8,038 bytes)
3. Re: Question for rear end experts (score: 1): Author: "Louis & Laila" <bwana@c2i2.com>; Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 13:14:57 -0700; Ed, Someone on the list can surely give you the details, but basically, all north American Series 5's came with 4.22 ratios up to a certain serial number in the 10,000 or 11,000 range, whether they h; /html/alpines/2001-06/msg00211.html (8,468 bytes)
4. Re: Question for rear end experts (score: 1): Author: rnanzig@webtv.net (robert nanzig); Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:36:46 -0400 (EDT); Ed, My parts manual says the 4.22 was used with standard transmissions on Series Vs up to B395010312 when they began putting in the 3.89s . Hope this helps. If you do have a 3.89 with overdrive you o; /html/alpines/2001-06/msg00213.html (7,229 bytes)
5. RE: Question for rear end experts (score: 1): Author: "Paul and Susan Almjeld" <palmjeld@home.com>; Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 21:47:15 -0500; Hi all: That sounds about right, Rob. Ol' Blue is #14649 and the rear axle is a 3.89. So, with the 3.89 and my 5 speed, cruising is really nice! --Original Message-- From: owner-alpines@autox.team.ne; /html/alpines/2001-06/msg00214.html (7,682 bytes)
6. Question for rear end experts (score: 1): Author: Jay_Laifman@countrywide.com; Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 08:14:01 -0700; I have a 3:89 with an OD and am very happy with the combo. It depends on what you want the car for. Assume you never turn on the OD. The 4.22 will be quicker and put less stress on the car from loadi; /html/alpines/2001-06/msg00221.html (8,173 bytes)
7. Re: Question for rear end experts (score: 1): Author: "Ian Spencer" <SpenceIC@Healthall.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:58:18 -0500; Jay is right. I too have the same set up on both my Harringtons except I don't have the Holbay engine. One has a 3.89 and the other a 3.70. I do see some loss of acceleration off the line, but the ga; /html/alpines/2001-06/msg00222.html (8,895 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]