Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*RPM\s+to\s+MPH\s+Question\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Re: RPM to MPH Question (score: 1)
Author: Peter Ficklin <pficklin@qnis.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 1999 17:56:45 -0700
So Joe, In regards to this message, just what is your observed RPM (more-or-less) with the 3.89 @ 70+ mph? I'm assuming there should be no difference in tranny (early vs. late) because of the 4th gea
/html/spitfires/1999-08/msg00020.html (8,107 bytes)

2. Re: RPM to MPH Question (score: 1)
Author: Peter Ficklin <pficklin@qnis.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 1999 19:21:46 -0700
Andy & Joe, Got it. Thanks for the info. The link is at http://www.vtr.org/maintain/gearbox-ratios.html for all of those wondering... Peter --
/html/spitfires/1999-08/msg00025.html (7,267 bytes)

3. Re: RPM to MPH Question (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Sinclair" <sinclair@degenkolb.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 13:16:25 -0700
I went through this decision process a while ago and came to the conclusion that the 3.29 would be too low unless you were running a bigger or highly modified engine. This was based on advice from ma
/html/spitfires/1999-08/msg00065.html (7,498 bytes)

4. RPM to MPH Question (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Ambrose" <tambrose@tir.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 13:56:48 -0400
Can anyone point me to a formula that converts RPM to MPH using tire size, tranny gear ratio, and diff ratio? What'd I forget? TIA Tom My Spit is on the road, yuck
/html/spitfires/1999-07/msg01058.html (7,162 bytes)

5. re: RPM to MPH Question (score: 1)
Author: "Arthur H. Smith" <arthurhsmith@compuserve.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 15:51:19 -0400
Message text written by "Tom Ambrose" tranny gear ratio, and diff ratio? What'd I forget?< engine rpm divide by final ratio times the circumferance of the rear tires (in inches) then divide by 12 the
/html/spitfires/1999-07/msg01070.html (7,583 bytes)

6. Re: RPM to MPH Question (score: 1)
Author: Bob Norway <examiner@scci.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 19:39:58 -0400
OK, what's the formula for finding the circumference if all you know is the diameter? -- Bob Norway Rockledge, Florida Home Page http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Lobby/5953/mypage.html ICQ# 37527
/html/spitfires/1999-07/msg01081.html (8,625 bytes)

7. Re: RPM to MPH Question (score: 1)
Author: Kirk Crawford <kirk.crawford@beachnet.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 16:54:49 -0700
Circumference = Pi * Diameter. Pi = 3.14159... -- Kirk Crawford mailto:kirk.crawford@beachnet.com http://www.beachnet.com/~crawford/ AIM:KirkBCraw
/html/spitfires/1999-07/msg01082.html (8,207 bytes)

8. Re: RPM to MPH Question (score: 1)
Author: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 17:01:12 -0700
Try PiD (Pi times the diameter) Joe -- "If you can't excel with talent, triumph with effort." -- Dave Weinbaum in National Enquirer
/html/spitfires/1999-07/msg01084.html (7,236 bytes)

9. Re: RPM to MPH Question (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Ambrose" <tambrose@tir.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 20:31:31 -0400
Why on earth does Tom want know? Because he is contemplating three different diffy ratios: 4.11, 3.89 (no surprise yet), and a 3.29 for his spitter. This must be a slow night. BTW, thanks for all the
/html/spitfires/1999-07/msg01085.html (7,887 bytes)

10. RE: RPM to MPH Question (score: 1)
Author: Craig Smith <CraigS@iewc.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 18:53:48 -0500
We have a bunch of CPU engineers on the list and probably not many ME's But here goes; Circumference or perimeeter=2pie r = pie d r= radius d= diameter Not too bad for a wire salesman, HUH ? size, OK
/html/spitfires/1999-07/msg01086.html (8,993 bytes)

11. RE: RPM to MPH Question (score: 1)
Author: Craig Smith <CraigS@iewc.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 19:43:06 -0500
I have no idea, I was damn impressed that I knew where to look up that formula for circumference ! I impressed myself ! Why on earth does Tom want know? Because he is contemplating three different di
/html/spitfires/1999-07/msg01087.html (8,201 bytes)

12. Re: RPM to MPH Question (score: 1)
Author: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 17:52:33 -0700
Tom, Here are a few observations I have made on my own Spit with a 1500 engine. 1. With the 4.11 that I originally had, the Spit got away like a rocket, but suffered badly on the top end. 2. With the
/html/spitfires/1999-07/msg01088.html (8,279 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu