Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*RTP\s+vs\.\s+PAX\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*RTP\s+vs\.\s+PAX\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. RTP vs. PAX (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>; Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 10:56:24 -0400; This is exactly why I prefer the PAX index over the RTP. As I understand it, the RTP is generated largely mathematically, while the PAX is generated largely by intuition and common sense. Am I right?; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00463.html (7,033 bytes)
2. Re: RTP vs. PAX (score: 1): Author: GSMnow@aol.com; Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 11:50:16 EDT; This is exactly why I prefer the PAX index over the RTP. As I understand it, the RTP is generated largely mathematically, while the PAX is generated largely by intuition and common sense. Am I right; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00471.html (10,535 bytes)
3. Re: RTP vs. PAX (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Hirt" <nxracer@mediaone.net>; Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 12:25:15 -0500; The PAX is mathematically too. Look at last years nationals, the top HS car was 1.307 seconds Faster than the top ES car. Guess what, they were both Celicas. Sure the nationals is a two day event and; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00477.html (7,526 bytes)
4. Re: RTP vs. PAX (score: 1): Author: Danielle Engstrom <aria@interaccess.com>; Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 07:54:05 -0500; When and where was this voted on?? I never heard anything about it. And while we're on the subject, I'd just like to say that I really don't appreciate how Rick (Mr. RTP) really stuck it to AM this; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00506.html (12,228 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]