Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Radar\s+Detectors\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Radar\s+Detectors\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. radar detectors (score: 1): Author: "Lovelady Diamond / A Diamond Affair" <diamonds@gemgate.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 16:38:55 -0800; The long awaited beast is almost ready for the road after a 3 year restoration. Before I indulge myself with the gas pedal I need insurance. I know the technology for radar detectors changes regularl; /html/tigers/2000-01/msg00369.html (7,017 bytes)
2. Re: radar detectors (score: 1): Author: Larry Paulick <larry.p@erols.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 18:56:51 -0500; Valentine is expensive, but works better than anything else. I have a ticket with an older detector to prove it. Now have a Valentine, with lots of warning. Larry; /html/tigers/2000-01/msg00371.html (6,912 bytes)
3. Re: radar detectors (score: 1): Author: comorgan@juno.com; Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 22:47:02 -0700; My advice is to forget about the radar detectors. My theory is that people that use detectors get more tickets than those that do not.. At least that has been my experience. The problem with detector; /html/tigers/2000-01/msg00381.html (7,357 bytes)
4. Re: radar detectors (score: 1): Author: "Steve Griffing" <bartdog@mindspring.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 06:16:17 -0500; I'm with Cliff, The one time I trusted the box instead of my own good sense I was busted, in an Omni pickup no less.; /html/tigers/2000-01/msg00384.html (7,739 bytes)
5. Re: radar detectors (score: 1): Author: Tiger2@telus.net; Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 14:58:09 -0800; I would concur, there is no substitute for paying attention to what's going on around you. Detectors tend to give a false sense of security and don't work for all enforcement applications. All the pe; /html/tigers/2000-01/msg00406.html (7,934 bytes)
6. Radar detectors (score: 1): Author: DJoh797014@aol.com; Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 19:01:29 EST; Here in IL, the Politzei have switched to Laser detectors. With its instant on capability and speed of light pulse, by the time you detector goes off, its too late. Friends that are cops, say they al; /html/tigers/2000-01/msg00415.html (7,605 bytes)
7. Re: radar detectors (score: 1): Author: RSpontelli@aol.com; Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 21:36:49 EST; << > My advice is to forget about the radar detectors. . . . sense I was busted, in an Omni pickup no less. >> Something wrong with using the box AND your own good sense? You guys can help yourselves; /html/tigers/2000-01/msg00426.html (7,162 bytes)
8. Radar detectors (score: 1): Author: DJoh797014@aol.com; Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 19:04:54 EST; The best radar dectector I have found for road travel is the CB. Never came across a radar trap that the CB didn't give miles of notice. Works great for the bear in the air. Indiana State Police use; /html/tigers/1999-12/msg00013.html (6,674 bytes)
9. radar detectors (score: 1): Author: "scott van every" <irishve@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 11 Dec 1999 18:34:01 PST; Hello fellow listers: Has anyone come across a radar detector that doesn't sit up on the dash with wires hanging down? I was riding in a BMW of a friend of a friend and this car had a completely buil; /html/tigers/1999-12/msg00109.html (6,697 bytes)
10. Radar Detectors (score: 1): Author: twojohnsons@home.com; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 08:39:18 -0500; I'm thinking about a radar detector, and I'm told the Valentine is state of the art & is worth the "twice the price" cost over its competitors. So.....is it???? Al Johnson; /html/tigers/1999-11/msg00342.html (6,339 bytes)
11. Re: Radar Detectors (score: 1): Author: Larry Paulick <larry.p@erols.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 09:37:40 -0500; Yes. You learn after you get a ticket with a lesser detector. Larry; /html/tigers/1999-11/msg00343.html (6,309 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]