Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Range\s+vs\.\s+Land\s+and\s+Rover\,\s+the\s+Truth\s+form\s+a\s+know\-nothing\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Range vs. Land and Rover, the Truth form a know-nothing (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Ray" <danray@bluegrass.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 1998 18:44:36 -0600
Not that I know ANYTHING about these vehicles, but, I'm a voracious reader of all things automotive: 1. Both are/were made by Rover 2. The Land became Range, when leather seats, stereos, AC, etc, wer
/html/mgs/1998-03/msg01478.html (7,821 bytes)

2. Re: Range vs. Land and Rover, the Truth form a know-nothing (score: 1)
Author: Philip Morgan <padre@billman.kuntrynet.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 1998 21:50:15 -0800
Essentially - The Land Rover is the British response to the Jeep, only a lot better! The basic Jeep then equates to your basic Land Rover, whilst the top of the line Jeep Cherokee would equate to the
/html/mgs/1998-03/msg01489.html (8,506 bytes)

3. Re: Range vs. Land and Rover, the Truth form a know-nothing (score: 1)
Author: miker15@juno.com
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 1998 00:19:13 EST
Actually its a "chicken and egg" thing -not really a "response" since the Range Rover was introduced in 1969 and remained essentially unchanged until its facelift in 1993, the same year jeep facelift
/html/mgs/1998-03/msg01504.html (7,702 bytes)

4. Re: Range vs. Land and Rover, the Truth form a know-nothing (score: 1)
Author: Philip Morgan <padre@billman.kuntrynet.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 1998 09:50:04 -0800
War II because the British had seen the versatility of the Willys Jeep. Having seen the vehicle they determined they could do a better job and then went on to build the Land Rover. In my opinion the
/html/mgs/1998-03/msg01520.html (9,383 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu