Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Re\;\s+Aero\s+Revelations\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Re\;\s+Aero\s+Revelations\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re; Aero Revelations (score: 1): Author: BWANA343@aol.com; Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:17:37 EST; the "point of diminishing returns". So ideally, if we manufacture 2 vehicles with identical drivetrain/passenger pods, one with 16 degrees and one at 6 degrees, shouldn't a wind tunnel answer which i; /html/land-speed/2005-01/msg00212.html (7,218 bytes)
2. RE: Re; Aero Revelations (score: 1): Author: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 12:42:08 -0600; Yes, it should get you an answer if you could find a tunnel that has a moving floor to account for the ground effect. I'd rely on timing slips for a higher- accuracy answer. Regards, Neil Tucson, AZ; /html/land-speed/2005-01/msg00213.html (7,874 bytes)
3. Re: Re; Aero Revelations (score: 1): Author: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 10:49:24 -0800; I agree with Neil! There is nothing that compares to the "Great White Dyno" to answer these questions. Tom, Redding CA - #216 D/CC; /html/land-speed/2005-01/msg00214.html (7,422 bytes)
4. Re: Re; Aero Revelations (score: 1): Author: DaCudaKid@aol.com; Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:35:47 EST; There are a couple of wind tunnels with moving floors, the only problem is that (unless they've changed them) the floors only had a maximum capability of 150 mph while the fans could blow at 220+ mph; /html/land-speed/2005-01/msg00218.html (7,543 bytes)
5. Re: Re; Aero Revelations (score: 1): Author: pork.pie@t-online.de (Pork Pie); Date: 10 Jan 2005 21:52 GMT; The base is the same cross section.......the nose is the same.......if the nose is aerodynamic standard shape......the 6 degrees will be faster by aerodynamic....if both cars got still the same weigh; /html/land-speed/2005-01/msg00219.html (7,943 bytes)
6. Re: Re; Aero Revelations (score: 1): Author: Bryan Savage <b.a.savage@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:11:14 -0800; Sorry -- I left out a bunch of words. How about a data aq., speed sensor and a good accelerometer? The coast down numbers should be fairly accurate is there isn't much wind. Bryan; /html/land-speed/2005-01/msg00221.html (8,379 bytes)
7. RE: Re; Aero Revelations (score: 1): Author: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:06:44 -0600; That should give you some very good data; however, timing slips are the "final authority." Regards, Neil Tucson, AZ Sorry -- I left out a bunch of words. How about a data aq., speed sensor and a goo; /html/land-speed/2005-01/msg00222.html (7,811 bytes)
8. Re: Re; Aero Revelations (score: 1): Author: BWANA343@aol.com; Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 21:36:27 EST; Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) was gone over not too long ago. I just checked the Archives and surfed back to _http://www.aerodynwindtunnel.com/index.html_ (http://www.aerodynwindtunnel.com/index; /html/land-speed/2005-01/msg00224.html (7,283 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]