Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rear\-engined\s+Bugeye\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rear\-engined\s+Bugeye\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Rear-engined Bugeye (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 13:39:36 -0500; Didn't British Leyland invest some time and money developing a rear-engined vehicle? As I remember, if you looked at it from the passenger side, it looked like a graph of their sales in the US. Regar; /html/spridgets/2000-11/msg00810.html (6,504 bytes)
2. Re: Rear-engined Bugeye (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 14:17:34 -0500; The TR-7 ("The Shape of Things to Come") was front-engined.; /html/spridgets/2000-11/msg00814.html (7,026 bytes)
3. Re: Rear-engined Bugeye (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 21:01:01 -0500; I have an article on the BMC Sprout (yes, sprout). It was on the drawing board back in 1960 or 61. It was either a rear engine Bugeye or a front wheel drive bugeye. I forget which one it was. But it; /html/spridgets/2000-11/msg00828.html (7,022 bytes)
4. Re: Rear-engined Bugeye (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 10:08:08 EST; << The TR-7 ("The Shape of Things to Come") was front-engined. Yes, but check with the TR list..I beleive it was originally designed as a mid engine and when money got tight they threw it in the boot; /html/spridgets/2000-11/msg00857.html (6,623 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]