Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rear\s+Shock\s+Access\s+for\s+SS\s+\&\s+BSP\s+Corvettes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rear\s+Shock\s+Access\s+for\s+SS\s+\&\s+BSP\s+Corvettes\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. Rear Shock Access for SS & BSP Corvettes (score: 1): Author: "boyracer" <boyracer@uswest.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 21:22:59 -0700; Recently I have noticed some people cutting holes in the interior of their C4 and C5 corvettes to gain access to the rear shock adjustment. The holes are not that big (about 1.0" diameter), instead o; /html/autox/2000-08/msg00708.html (8,050 bytes)
2. Re: Rear Shock Access for SS & BSP Corvettes (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 01:08:34 EDT; << Recently I have noticed some people cutting holes in the interior of their C4 and C5 corvettes to gain access to the rear shock adjustment. The holes are not that big (about 1.0" diameter), instea; /html/autox/2000-08/msg00710.html (9,337 bytes)
3. Re: Rear Shock Access for SS & BSP Corvettes (score: 1): Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <eric10mm@qni.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 00:15:53 -0500; Umm, nothing if they put a pair of tweeters in the holes. ;^) (That's audiophile terminology for the Arkansas readers out there.) Semantics? I'm always up for some antics. Eric Linnhoff in KC '98 Neo; /html/autox/2000-08/msg00713.html (8,906 bytes)
4. Re: Rear Shock Access for SS & BSP Corvettes (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>; Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 04:14:33 -0400; Oh, c'mon, Charlie, you know better than that. It's not the Chief of Impound's job to do anything about that. It's the competitors' job to file a protest. Mark; /html/autox/2000-08/msg00716.html (8,470 bytes)
5. Re: Rear Shock Access for SS & BSP Corvettes (score: 1): Author: rohns@doitnow.com (Jim & Marilyn Rohn); Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 07:56:24 -0700; Except if you own a Lotus, then the holes that the top of the shocks punched through the fiberglass front aprons will be considered illegal (per 1999 ruling in ASP at Nationals); /html/autox/2000-08/msg00739.html (10,342 bytes)
6. RE: Rear Shock Access for SS & BSP Corvettes (score: 1): Author: "Isley, Jason C." <JIsley@cell1.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 09:08:03 -0700; I have a hole saw, where do I drill my hole for shock access. Man now I may have to drill some holes in my air filter lid for increased air flow, I mean speaker installation.. :) Jason "RX7 KLR" Isle; /html/autox/2000-08/msg00750.html (9,202 bytes)
7. Re: Rear Shock Access for SS & BSP Corvettes (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 12:48:38 EDT; << Except if you own a Lotus, then the holes that the top of the shocks punched through the fiberglass front aprons will be considered illegal (per 1999 ruling in ASP at Nationals) >> Can you spell "; /html/autox/2000-08/msg00751.html (8,447 bytes)
8. Re: Rear Shock Access for SS & BSP Corvettes (score: 1): Author: "Steven N. Burkett" <sburkett@ooi.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 11:53:55 -0500 (CDT); So are these protest rulings actually written down and archived somewhere? If so, where? Seems like that would be at least as useful as the "clarifications" in the rule book. If not more so. Thanks!; /html/autox/2000-08/msg00752.html (8,699 bytes)
9. Re: Rear Shock Access for SS & BSP Corvettes (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>; Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 13:32:42 -0400; No, it's not. It's not the same thing at all. The ASP issue was that the shocks poked the hole itself, due to being placed close to the fiberglass, and lots of Lotus flex. It's standard wear and tear; /html/autox/2000-08/msg00757.html (8,791 bytes)
10. Re: Rear Shock Access for SS & BSP Corvettes (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 14:18:00 EDT; Mark responded: << Oh, c'mon, Charlie, you know better than that. It's not the Chief of Impound's job to do anything about that. It's the competitors' job to file a protest. >> No, I don't know bett; /html/autox/2000-08/msg00766.html (8,817 bytes)
11. Re: Rear Shock Access for SS & BSP Corvettes (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Stevens" <kevin_stevens@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 11:18:33 PDT; It seems reasonable to allow people to cut holes for speakers. I don't see that it's then necessary or reasonable to allow them to take the speakers out and use the holes as access ports. KeS _______; /html/autox/2000-08/msg00767.html (8,996 bytes)
12. RE: Rear Shock Access for SS & BSP Corvettes (score: 1): Author: "Linnhoff, Eric" <elinnhoff@smmc.saint-lukes.org>; Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 13:43:12 -0500; And those Lotus owners were slapped on the backs of their hands and told to fix the problem before the 2000 Nationals. Eric Linnhoff in KC 1998 Dodge Neon R/T eric10mm@qni.com "We ourselves feel that; /html/autox/2000-08/msg00773.html (8,942 bytes)
13. Re: Rear Shock Access for SS & BSP Corvettes (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>; Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 14:51:33 -0400; Hmm. Looking at the 2000 Nationals Supps (which is where Impound is defined, it isn't in the rulebook) you may be right, but it's a little vague. See section F. It looks similar to last year's, but I; /html/autox/2000-08/msg00776.html (9,540 bytes)
14. Re: Rear Shock Access for SS & BSP Corvettes (score: 1): Author: Gail/Sid deLeon <deleon@sstar.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 14:07:42 -0500; Would this be called "Selective Enforcement"; /html/autox/2000-08/msg00777.html (9,831 bytes)
15. RE: Rear Shock Access for SS & BSP Corvettes (score: 1): Author: "Bill Fuhrmann" <bfuhrman@isd.net>; Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 19:18:56 -0500; Can you quote a rule or official statement that supports that statement? Just because they CAN doesn't mean that they MUST. My own opinion is that they SHOULDN'T protest anything that they have not; /html/autox/2000-08/msg00807.html (8,854 bytes)
16. Re: Rear Shock Access for SS & BSP Corvettes (score: 1): Author: "boyracer" <boyracer@uswest.net>; Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 17:32:26 -0700; I don't know about C5 corvettes but on the C4 corvettes not only would the interior panel be cut but the frame has to be cut to access the shock. Now you wouldn't think that the frame needs to be cut; /html/autox/2000-08/msg00808.html (7,567 bytes)
17. Re: Rear Shock Access for SS & BSP Corvettes (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 00:25:04 EDT; << Can you quote a rule or official statement that supports that statement? Just because they CAN doesn't mean that they MUST. >> Section 6.10, Page 67, 2000 National Solo 2000 rules: "During Impound; /html/autox/2000-08/msg00828.html (9,051 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]