Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rear\s+Spring\s+Differences\-\-More\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rear\s+Spring\s+Differences\-\-More\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Rear Spring Differences--More (score: 1): Author: "Robert Poague" <rapoague@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 21:50:49 -0700; Thanks for your responses, Alan and Jim. My reason for asking the question When I acquired my BJ7 many years ago, the rear end sat lower than normal. Assuming the springs were tired, I ordered a new; /html/healeys/2006-07/msg00086.html (8,071 bytes)
2. Re: Rear Spring Differences--More (score: 1): Author: "Alan Seigrist Blue 100" <healey.nut@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 14:39:47 +0800; Or maybe the SC springs are just a pile of rubbish made by the lowest bidder!! Best Regards, Alan '53 BN1 '64 BJ8 '53 A90 On 7/4/06, Robert Poague <rapoague@comcast.net> wrote:; /html/healeys/2006-07/msg00087.html (8,601 bytes)
3. Re: Rear Spring Differences--More (score: 1): Author: Dave & M <rusd@velocitus.net>; Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 00:58:12 -0700; Hi Bob, The new Moss springs (021-581) that I got for my BN2 a couple of years ago have 7 active leaves which are .160" thick, plus the extra wrap around ends. Sometimes called 8 leaf. The back sat a; /html/healeys/2006-07/msg00088.html (9,682 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]