Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rear\s+axles\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. RE: Rear axles (score: 1)
Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2000 10:17:02 -0700
I'm afraid I'm a bit confused what you are trying to do in your post. But here goes. 1. All MGB rear axle assemblies are narrower for wire wheels than for steel wheels. 2. Banjo axle rear axles (63-
/html/mgs/2000-08/msg00025.html (9,447 bytes)

2. Re: Rear axles (score: 1)
Author: Glenn Schnittke <schnittke@mindspring.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2000 18:17:32 -0500
I have a late MGB rear axle sitting here without the hubs attached - What I'm trying to do is find out how to tell a late MGB rear axle set up for wire wheels from a late MGB rear axle set up for dis
/html/mgs/2000-08/msg00046.html (7,331 bytes)

3. RE: Rear axles (score: 1)
Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2000 16:32:37 -0700
Aha. Now you are talking. I have a WW late axle assembly sitting in my storage building with the hubs and drums off. I can measure the length tonight. I'll get you a measurement between the flanges t
/html/mgs/2000-08/msg00048.html (8,345 bytes)

4. RE: Rear axles (score: 1)
Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 10:11:16 -0700
Here is the info on the rear end case dimensions. These measurements are from the brake backing plate flange to brake backing plate flange. Early Banjo Wire Wheel 44.5" Steel Wheel 46.25" Late Sauls
/html/mgs/2000-08/msg00099.html (8,380 bytes)

5. Re: Rear axles (score: 1)
Author: Dave Quirt <quirt@sk.sympatico.ca>
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2000 18:40:47 -0600
OK Kelvin: which model Magnette?? Dave Q.
/html/mgs/2000-08/msg00149.html (6,839 bytes)

6. Re: Rear axles (score: 1)
Author: Chris Kotting <ckotting@core.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2000 11:56:43 -0400
Kelvin has a ZB Magnette (I think it's a 58, but I'm not sure).
/html/mgs/2000-08/msg00189.html (7,104 bytes)

7. RE: Rear axles (score: 1)
Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2000 09:20:44 -0700
The rear end casing came out of either a 56 ZA or a 58 ZB, I'm not sure which. So far as I know the two are the same, but I have not checked part numbers. In answer to Michael's question, the Magnett
/html/mgs/2000-08/msg00192.html (9,062 bytes)

8. Re: Rear axles (score: 1)
Author: WSpohn4@aol.com
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2000 19:08:53 EDT
ask The diff is wider, wheel to wheel than the diffs found in the sports cars, but does take the same third member etc. Elva Couriers had A series diffs, out of a Riley 1.5 I think, which, like the M
/html/mgs/2000-08/msg00244.html (7,863 bytes)

9. Rear axles (score: 1)
Author: Glenn Schnittke <schnittke@mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 21:34:56 -0500
Well, I'm back and I have a question. Having just lost a '69 B to an idiot in traffic (I'm not upset - he did me a favor), I'm finishing out a '67 B as a replacement daily driver. I'm working on the
/html/mgs/2000-07/msg01577.html (7,026 bytes)

10. rear axles (score: 1)
Author: "Randy Rees (Starwave)" <Randyr@starwave.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 96 15:42:00 PDT
I Have a banjo type rear axle. What are the advantages or disadvantages to it VS. the tube type.. Also have heard many differing opinions on changing a wire wheeled car to bolt on. The Wire wheeled i
/html/mgs/1996-08/msg00335.html (7,273 bytes)

11. Re: rear axles (score: 1)
Author: "Christopher M. Delling" <cdelling@mail.ic.net>
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 1996 22:55:57 -0400
Randy They switched away from the "Banjo" rear end on the MGBGT, due to the fact that it was noisy. Wasn't a problem in the roadster - enuf other noises to mask the sound. The quiter GT on the other
/html/mgs/1996-08/msg00343.html (7,888 bytes)

12. Re: rear axles (score: 1)
Author: Glenn Schnittke <glenns@edge.ercnet.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 1996 22:52:28 -0500 (CDT)
Allan, I know this is late, but I've been in computer hell for the past three weeks with a system upgrade. If I were a betting man I'd say check the exhaust manifold connection to the header pipe. W
/html/mgs/1996-08/msg00344.html (8,155 bytes)

13. Re: rear axles (score: 1)
Author: Lane Rollins <laner@teleport.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 10:50:15 -0800
Okay... riddle me this then. Why did the Magnette (ZA/ZB not sure of the Mk III/IV) use the Banjo type axle? There were many other coupes and sedans that used the standard 'B' type rear axle. Now th
/html/mgs/1996-08/msg00374.html (7,034 bytes)

14. Re: rear axles (score: 1)
Author: tom.wagner@Central.Sun.COM (Tom Wagner - Program Manager)
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 1996 12:55:51 -0500
I have seen a lot of threads going around about different types of rear ends. I have a 67 B, and it was made in time when the changes where taken place between the two different types of rear axles.
/html/mgs/1996-08/msg00463.html (6,980 bytes)

15. RE: rear axles (score: 1)
Author: "Randy Rees (Starwave)" <Randyr@starwave.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 96 11:11:00 PDT
The banjo type axle is a single cast housing that is completely smooth and definitely one piece. Whereas the tube type axle has definite structural lines. I have seen a lot of threads going around ab
/html/mgs/1996-08/msg00467.html (7,256 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu