Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rear\s+shock\s+mount\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rear\s+shock\s+mount\s+question\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Rear shock mount question (score: 1): Author: HealeyBN7@aol.com; Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 11:50:27 EST; I recently noticed that the rear shock mounts on my BN7 have the shock mounting holes worn oval. I remember reading that the holes in the shocks might do this, but don't recall any discussion about t; /html/healeys/2005-02/msg00207.html (7,607 bytes)
2. Re: Rear shock mount question (score: 1): Author: MBran89793@aol.com; Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 12:09:37 EST; Hi Dave I did a quick check and found the shock mounting plates for the BN1 & BN2, BN4-BJ7, & BJ8 offered in the British Car Specialists (Kilmartin Sheetmetal) catalog Marion S. Brantley, Jr. 727/867; /html/healeys/2005-02/msg00208.html (7,570 bytes)
3. Re: Rear shock mount question (score: 1): Author: Blue One Hundred <international_investor@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 09:53:39 -0800 (PST); Yep, probably the worst design flaw on a healey. wrong shock mounts. The trick with them is to tighten them down with mega torque. It actually works... they have to be very tight but it will hold. I; /html/healeys/2005-02/msg00210.html (8,669 bytes)
4. Re: Rear shock mount question (score: 1): Author: Earl Kagna <kags@shaw.ca>; Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 13:18:23 -0800; One thing to note here - the Putzke tube shock conversion kit still uses the rear shock mount plate on the frame. A riser bracket is bolted to it that furnishes the upper shock mounting point for th; /html/healeys/2005-02/msg00217.html (9,749 bytes)
5. Re: Rear shock mount question (score: 1): Author: "Keith Pennell" <pennell@cox.net>; Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 16:55:24 -0500; I agree with one other lister that replacement of the mounts is the best fix. However, if it happened to me I believe I would undertake the following. Drill out the holes to a standard size, 1/2 inc; /html/healeys/2005-02/msg00221.html (8,409 bytes)
6. RE: Rear shock mount question (score: 1): Author: "Ron Fine" <RonFineEsq@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 15:06:01 -0800; After my frame was sand blasted I found that not only were several of the bolt holes oval but there were small stress cracks at the edge of two holes. The cracks were hidden by the old paint and dirt; /html/healeys/2005-02/msg00224.html (8,249 bytes)
7. RE: Rear shock mount question (score: 1): Author: "Quinn, Patrick" <Patrick.Quinn@det.nsw.edu.au>; Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 10:12:41 +1100; Eons ago before the days of Kilmartins and other readily available spares and restorers for Austin-Healeys. (Sitting before the open fire explaining to my grandchildren how Austin-Healey ownership w; /html/healeys/2005-02/msg00225.html (9,312 bytes)
8. Re: Rear shock mount question (score: 1): Author: "Bluechipracing" <bluechipracing@snet.net>; Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 21:33:37 -0500; Dave: I reamed the bolt holes in the rear shocks and mounts for a snug fit for the next size bolt (7/16-20 I believe). Used high-strength allen head bolts. Been good for several years. Keep 'em tight; /html/healeys/2005-02/msg00230.html (8,405 bytes)
9. Re: Rear shock mount question (score: 1): Author: SJNNOCK@aol.com; Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 23:11:53 EST; lf any body would like a KILMARTIN catalog send me your US mail address ... rear shock brackets are shown on page 6 .... AH 181 =BN1 - BN2 ... AH281A = BN4-BJ7 ... AH281B = BJ8 ... Norman Nock...Brit; /html/healeys/2005-02/msg00232.html (7,270 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]