Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rear\s+shocks\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rear\s+shocks\?\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Rear shocks? (score: 1): Author: "T. S. White" <tswrace@pacbell.net>; Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 09:01:01 -0700; I am having trouble making up my mind on a conversion of my rear I have a TR-3 with a Ford 289 driveline in it. The original level shocks are weak. I have found a reference to a conversion kit for TR; /html/mgb-v8/2003-06/msg00026.html (8,759 bytes)
2. RE: Rear shocks? (score: 1): Author: "Larry Hoy" <list@marketvalue.net>; Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 15:48:27 -0600; Tom, the tube shock conversion is a popular one for an MGB, mostly because it is simple and cheaper than buying rebuilt lever shocks. I am not convienced the tube shocks provide any advantages over t; /html/mgb-v8/2003-06/msg00028.html (8,937 bytes)
3. RE: Rear shocks? (score: 1): Author: Simon Green <sgreen@eurobell.net>; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 09:25:28 +0100; The problem I have always had with lever shocks is the quality of the recon ones. If you can get good recon or new they work well. The other problem with them is how long they last. If you are looki; /html/mgb-v8/2003-06/msg00030.html (8,095 bytes)
4. Re: Rear shocks? (score: 1): Author: "Telewest $PH$" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 15:37:55 +0100; as much difference as a rear anti-roll bar, part from making the ride very harsh unless they are on their softest setting. It is financially worth while going through a couple of bad rebuilds rather; /html/mgb-v8/2003-06/msg00032.html (9,250 bytes)
5. Re: Rear shocks? (score: 1): Author: "James Nazarian" <jhn3@uakron.edu>; Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2003 00:47:18 -0400; I am using Spax Adjustables, due in large part to my finding the whole kit for half what rebuilding my levers would have cost. If you have any doubts about the stiffness of the levers you can get the; /html/mgb-v8/2003-06/msg00033.html (9,764 bytes)
6. Re: Rear shocks? (score: 1): Author: "Carl Floyd" <cmfloyd@chartertn.net>; Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2003 11:27:26 -0400; << If you have any doubts about the stiffness of the levers you can get the uprated valves which are about 25% stiffer, and, I am told, excellent for performance applications.>> I spoke with Peter Ca; /html/mgb-v8/2003-06/msg00046.html (9,659 bytes)
7. Re: Rear shocks? (score: 1): Author: CraigFaubel@aol.com; Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2003 20:50:47 EDT; I have a heavier differential assembly on my conversion - I'm wanting to stiffen up the rear lever shocks because of the increased unsprung weight. Does that seem right to you more experienced people; /html/mgb-v8/2003-06/msg00050.html (6,866 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]