Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rear\s+shocks\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rear\s+shocks\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Rear shocks (score: 1): Author: "Tweedy, Todd" <Todd.Tweedy@vw.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 20:45:53 -0500; I need to replace the rear shocks in my 69 MGC Roadster. Which would you suggest? 1. Have the lever arm shocks rebuilt along with installing the heavy-duty shock valves. 2. Install the Monroe Tube sh; /html/mgs/2000-07/msg01167.html (6,795 bytes)
2. Re: Rear shocks (score: 1): Author: "Rick Ehlert" <ricke@idcnet.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 10:27:25 -0500; I would definately prefer anything but those lever shocks!! Even new they sucked! The ride is much improved with tube shocks, IMHO of course! Rick Ehlert Milwaukee 1965 MGB 1966 Sunbeam Alpine V (FOR; /html/mgs/2000-07/msg01193.html (7,234 bytes)
3. Re: Rear shocks (score: 1): Author: WSpohn4@aol.com; Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 12:57:13 EDT; You don't say what you do with the car. If you like slaloming, then any of the 3 would work. If you are street driver, then #1 without the stiffer valves woudl probably be fine. One caveat - don't fi; /html/mgs/2000-07/msg01205.html (7,037 bytes)
4. Re: Rear shocks (score: 1): Author: Barrie Robinson <barrier@bconnex.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 13:17:37 -0400; I got a rear tube shock setup from Australia which are great. They keep the shock vertical to axle which gives better performance. They use Monroe shocks specifically set for the MGB. Will send pict; /html/mgs/2000-07/msg01210.html (8,010 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]