Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rear\s+suspension\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rear\s+suspension\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. rear suspension (score: 1): Author: "gary baker" <lsr350@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 18:54:39 +1000; what are your opinions , how important is rear suspension in LSR ,why I ask is Im in serious need of space at the back of the vehicle ( think streamliner or similar) and if I make the rear end solid; /html/land-speed/2005-03/msg00379.html (6,590 bytes)
2. Re: rear suspension (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <saltracer@servusa.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 08:29:51 -0500; Solid suspension works at Bonneville. Regular suspension works better.; /html/land-speed/2005-03/msg00381.html (7,096 bytes)
3. Re: rear suspension (score: 1): Author: Bryan Savage <b.a.savage@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 05:58:39 -0800; In my opinion, it depends. I don't think it's worth the weight and complication above about 200 mph if you are using steel for wheels and suspension, but .... it can be very valuable in the first two; /html/land-speed/2005-03/msg00382.html (7,315 bytes)
4. RE: Rear suspension (score: 1): Author: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>; Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 10:26:33 -0600; Thanks for the reply, Stephen. If Dave Matson was ever in Redstone Arsenal, that must have been his. Of course, if he wasn't there-- whose bike was it? Surely there couldn't have been TWO three- Vinc; /html/land-speed/2001-12/msg00102.html (9,074 bytes)
5. Re: Rear suspension (score: 1): Author: "Stephen F. Doherty" <doherty5@pacbell.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 21:52:26 -0800; I forwarded your message to a Vincent mailing list. Here are the three replies I've received so far: "Dave Matson did a mock up in the 60's? of a 3 Vincent engine bike. It was done for publicity pur; /html/land-speed/2001-11/msg01117.html (8,224 bytes)
6. Rear suspension (score: 1): Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 06:28:12 -0500; Okay along the lines of the Trans mounting system.... I wanna do the rear suspension issues.... My thoughts are that a fancy rear suspension to make the car leave the line is a Moot point at Bonnevil; /html/land-speed/2001-10/msg00515.html (8,207 bytes)
7. Re: Rear suspension (score: 1): Author: "Nafzger" <nafzger@vtc.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 19:01:00 -0700; God knows I'm no expert on this and I have spent a lot of time anguishing over this problem on the two liners I have built. I made them both with rigid suspension for three basic reasons. 1. Less co; /html/land-speed/2001-10/msg00518.html (9,692 bytes)
8. Re: Rear suspension (score: 1): Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 05:05:47 -0400; I am not an expert either but i will tell you everyone that specs data acq from me wants the shocks to log in excess of 100 times per second so there must be something going on... But then there is d; /html/land-speed/2001-10/msg00520.html (10,601 bytes)
9. Re: Rear suspension (score: 1): Author: Joe Timney <joetimney@dol.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 07:36:03 -0400; Teaching suspension 101 over the internet is almost impossible. I have found that one must truely "want" to learn about suspension and be willing to spent the money to experiment and learn. All too; /html/land-speed/2001-10/msg00522.html (11,998 bytes)
10. Re: Rear suspension (score: 1): Author: "rgribble" <rgribble@carolina.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 09:05:04 -0700; Howard, Keith & List, Howard I understand your logic and this is not a disagreement, just a thought to ponder. If we set aside for now the reaction time of a sprung vs. solid suspension, consider per; /html/land-speed/2001-10/msg00523.html (12,501 bytes)
11. Re: Rear suspension (score: 1): Author: wspotter <wester6935@home.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 06:32:54 -0700; It's been pretty well proved (ask George Fields) that additional weight helps at Bonneville. Without a suspension it makes loading weight less intrusive in the handling. That might be one of the lar; /html/land-speed/2001-10/msg00524.html (10,727 bytes)
12. RE: Rear suspension (score: 1): Author: "Parks, David" <David.Parks@lfr.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 09:48:14 -0700; Do I have to have theory's? I just ran my 'girlie' camaro with the stock multileaf springs and stock shocks (from Autozone, I think). I added suspension stops upon which the car rides when the rear e; /html/land-speed/2001-10/msg00527.html (8,478 bytes)
13. Re: Rear suspension (score: 1): Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 12:02:19 -0500; Yeah Dave.. thanks for leaving the tip..... Hey is that car of yours still for sale? I know for a girly Camaro it sure held alot of records.... so Low tech ain't always bad.... K Do I have to have th; /html/land-speed/2001-10/msg00528.html (8,953 bytes)
14. Re: Rear suspension (score: 1): Author: William T Smith <WmTSmith@landracing.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 17:42:14 -0600 (MDT); I like that plan. wmts Quoting rgribble <rgribble@carolina.rr.com>: disagreement, just a vs. solid suspension, at least part of the with the ground. Then solid suspension, one or there is less tract; /html/land-speed/2001-10/msg00542.html (14,157 bytes)
15. Re: Rear suspension (score: 1): Author: "Nafzger" <nafzger@vtc.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 20:07:43 -0700; Grib & List, All valid points. Just like why we drive different brands of trucks, etc. One other major problem that is exclusive to liners, at least the ones I glue together, is the fact that the 5-s; /html/land-speed/2001-10/msg00551.html (14,786 bytes)
16. Re: Rear suspension (score: 1): Author: "rgribble" <rgribble@carolina.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 00:44:57 -0700; My solution for that would be four in-line independent turbo Busa' engines, one of each mounted at and driving each wheel. I think I'll sketch it out tomorrow and work up a budget. Ah, maybe not! Obv; /html/land-speed/2001-10/msg00552.html (16,702 bytes)
17. Re: Rear suspension (score: 1): Author: "Bryan A. Savage Jr" <basavage@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 23:11:12 -0700; Bingo! That's it! Better 1/4 mile = Higher 5th mile speed. Thanks Dave, Bryan /// /// land-speed@autox.team.net mailing list /// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net; /html/land-speed/2001-10/msg00553.html (9,176 bytes)
18. RE: Rear suspension (score: 1): Author: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 11:11:05 -0500; Back in '61 I was in the Army at Redstone Arsenal, AL. Someone-- I never did find out who-- had a LSR bike under construction there and it sounded alot like the layout you are thinking about. It had; /html/land-speed/2001-10/msg00560.html (9,755 bytes)
19. Fw: Rear suspension (score: 1): Author: "john backus" <34ford@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 20:29:01 -0400; Okay, okay, this may sound really stupid but I do have a theory about this. What if the engine, trans and rear end were mounted on one frame unit, attached at the front of the engine and the body was; /html/land-speed/2001-10/msg00572.html (10,218 bytes)
20. Re: Rear suspension (score: 1): Author: "john backus" <34ford@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 21:08:34 -0400; I knew that, I just had an senior brain-fart moment. John That's roughly what a torque tube drive does. Regards, Neil Tucson, AZ --Original Message-- From: john backus [mailto:34ford@msn.com] Sent: W; /html/land-speed/2001-10/msg00574.html (9,658 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]