Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rear\s+wheel\s+steering\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rear\s+wheel\s+steering\s*$/: 82 ]

Total 82 documents matching your query.

1. Rear Wheel Steering (score: 1): Author: "3liter" <saltfever@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 00:14:26 -0700; John Whitehead not only understands the physics of rear wheel steering but. most importantly, he identified the real problem as an almost imperceptible lag-time (or feedback delay) to the human drive; /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00001.html (8,330 bytes)
2. RE: Rear Wheel Steering (score: 1): Author: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 15:37:45 -0500; It would be interesting to see what his findings were. Regards, Neil Tucson, AZ John Whitehead not only understands the physics of rear wheel steering but. most importantly, he identified the real p; /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00014.html (8,672 bytes)
3. Re: Rear Wheel Steering (score: 1): Author: "DrMayf" <drmayf@teknett.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 15:29:21 -0700; I ordered his Phd Dissertation. He also did a Master of Science paper on a similar topic, but I think I can get that through an interlibrary loan. Oh, and Elon, doesn't he work at LLNL? I believe he; /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00017.html (9,739 bytes)
4. RE: Rear Wheel Steering (score: 1): Author: "Waldron, James" <James.Waldron@CWUSA.COM>; Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:41:38 -0400; (Is this a private food fight, or can anybody join in?) Well, this has certainly got the brain cells working overtime. I might as well put in my 2 cents for what (very little) it's worth. I got to th; /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00026.html (9,344 bytes)
5. Fw: Rear wheel steering (score: 1): Author: "John Burk" <joyseydevil@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 11:59:26 -0400; Front wheel steering is like a broom dangling from a nail in the wall . Rear wheel steering is like balancing a broom vertically on the palm of your hand and the faster you go the shorter the handle; /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00032.html (7,177 bytes)
6. Re: Rear Wheel Steering (score: 1): Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 05:53:33 -0500; The Apache is a tail dragger on the ground... and frankly it's not that hard to drive around.... except seeing of course which is the primary bitch about the whole tail dragger gig... Beauty of a Hel; /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00057.html (7,026 bytes)
7. Rear wheel steering (score: 1): Author: "Jim Dincau" <jdincau@qnet.com>; Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 15:54:44 -0700; Has anyone looked at what these guys have to say about the subject? http://www.thrustssc.com/thrustssc/contents_frames.html Jim in Palmdale, traction control is next; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00509.html (7,433 bytes)
8. Re: Rear wheel steering (score: 1): Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>; Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 18:46:28 -0500; Jim.... You be nice now you hear.... LOL Next your going to want to talk about Rotary factors and I'm not sure my hearts up to it... Hey The Thrust website has a great history of the LSR record... an; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00510.html (8,255 bytes)
9. Re: Rear wheel steering (score: 1): Author: "Glen Barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net>; Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 17:18:22 -0700; I'll still poopoo rear wheel steering xcept for fork lifts and jet cars if they so desire. The fact is it don't work in wheel driven race cars.and thats how I feel, thats old news anyway! Glen -- Ori; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00511.html (8,994 bytes)
10. RE: Rear wheel steering (score: 1): Author: "Landspeed Louise Ann Noeth" <landspeedlouise@adelphia.net>; Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 22:33:30 -0700; rear wheel steering is a headache -- it was used on ThrustSSC out of necessity, not choice. When a driver has to input full steering lock at plus 700mph, you know there is a better way, but you make; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00518.html (8,215 bytes)
11. Re: Rear wheel steering (score: 1): Author: "DrMayf" <drmayf@teknett.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 06:35:28 -0700; I am not sure that rear wheel steering is ineffective as you indicate below. That car used a couple of military jet engines with full afterburners, if I recall correctly. If the thrust angle is/was o; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00521.html (9,348 bytes)
12. Re: Rear wheel steering (score: 1): Author: Nt788@aol.com; Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:39:33 EDT; << this is not the way boys and girls >>Thrust had room for improvement. No closed minds please! Jack; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00523.html (7,873 bytes)
13. Re: Rear wheel steering (score: 1): Author: Nt788@aol.com; Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:47:10 EDT; << going straight where the engines point it and hardly any amount of wheel turn will correct it. It No closed mind here! Rear steering should be studied not banned! Jack; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00525.html (8,031 bytes)
14. Re: Rear wheel steering (score: 1): Author: Bryan Savage <basavage@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:55:32 -0700; On the runs Louise is referring to, I see two problems. The cockpit video shows the thrust differential gage NOT on center. At one point Andy backs out of the throttle because full lock can't overco; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00529.html (9,237 bytes)
15. Re: Rear wheel steering (score: 1): Author: "DrMayf" <drmayf@teknett.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 15:45:03 -0700; I agree, Jack. Rear steering has gotten some bad press because of bad designs and poor drivers. Nothing should ever be outlawed unless it is proven to be a true safety hazard to spectators...the driv; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00531.html (8,807 bytes)
16. Re: Rear wheel steering (score: 1): Author: "DrMayf" <drmayf@teknett.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 15:57:15 -0700; Sure, that works for me. The two engine's are producing a couple around the cg and that would be a real challenge to untwist with the contact partc of a rear wheel or two. More like a thrust vector s; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00532.html (10,907 bytes)
17. Re: Rear wheel steering (score: 1): Author: Bryan Savage <basavage@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 16:28:30 -0700; Some shots of the surface after a supersonic run http://www.thrustssc.com/Photographs/19971014/19971014003-review.JPG http://www.thrustssc.com/Photographs/19971014/19971014001-review.JPG http://www.; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00533.html (10,049 bytes)
18. Re: Rear wheel steering (score: 1): Author: "Glen Barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 16:14:24 -0700; it ain't been proven yet to be the way to go. It don't feel the same, and it don't steer the same. SCTA has allowed 2 or 3 in the past and not one went 1/2 mile before the driver lost the directional; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00534.html (9,731 bytes)
19. RE: Rear wheel steering (score: 1): Author: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 19:27:18 -0500; I wonder if part of the rear-wheel steering problem is having the driver sit way back toward the rear where he senses a steering correction as a "G" force in the wrong direction of what's intuitive.; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00535.html (9,630 bytes)
20. Re: Rear wheel steering (score: 1): Author: BWANA343@aol.com; Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 20:38:32 EDT; I thought I'd check in with my limited experience with Rear wheel Steering. I had the occasion, as a NY Fireman, to drive what are commonly known as Hook and Ladder trucks. The back end,or Tiller, is; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00537.html (9,092 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]