Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Recap\s+on\s+\'World\s+Records\s+Topic\'\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Recap\s+on\s+\'World\s+Records\s+Topic\'\s*$/: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

1. Recap on 'World Records Topic' (score: 1): Author: Malcolm Pittwood <MPittwood@compuserve.com>; Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 10:11:45 -0500; Tim and the List, With so many mailings and a few 'offshoot' topics I thought I should try to summarise to date what I understand the aim/desire/wish/dream of all this chat was about. I present my su; /html/land-speed/2001-02/msg00113.html (13,669 bytes)
2. Re: Recap on 'World Records Topic' (score: 1): Author: Joe Amo <jkamo@rapidnet.com>; Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 18:18:31 -0700; Malcom, YOU KNOW YOU WERE BORN TO DO THIS, DONT YOU??? Sincerely, many people find in life a niche, yours my man (among many things I am sure) is to head up such an endeavor as we are currently talki; /html/land-speed/2001-02/msg00125.html (15,855 bytes)
3. Re: Recap on 'World Records Topic' (score: 1): Author: Want1937hd@aol.com; Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 20:41:16 EST; Malcolm, I ran across this quote from T.E.Lawrence and thought you might enjoy it. " All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds, wake in the day to; /html/land-speed/2001-02/msg00127.html (8,345 bytes)
4. Re: Recap on 'World Records Topic' (score: 1): Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>; Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 06:22:33 -0600; Malcolm... I have read this with interest and written a response but I am afriad I left the Trailer on it.... so it will get here in a couple of days.... Yuck... Your recap was Good... As we are open; /html/land-speed/2001-02/msg00131.html (16,575 bytes)
5. Re: Recap on 'World Records Topic' (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 10:32:34 -0500; Don't see how this idea can get any less threatening than this. John Beckett bureaucracy Indeed As to this of accepted speed of two/three attempts remain any comparable records. organised events for; /html/land-speed/2001-02/msg00132.html (17,128 bytes)
6. Re: Recap on 'World Records Topic' (score: 1): Author: Nt788@aol.com; Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 12:43:46 EST; Local amateur groups with their own rules are fun, leave it that way! If I could afford a trip to Australia I would rather observe and participate by there rules, instead of being forced to go there; /html/land-speed/2001-02/msg00138.html (8,626 bytes)
7. Re: Recap on 'World Records Topic' (score: 1): Author: Nt788@aol.com; Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 12:54:59 EST; Malcolm You can only please some of the people some of the time, not all the people all of the time! Participate, see what its like! Jack /// /// land-speed@autox.team.net mailing list ///; /html/land-speed/2001-02/msg00140.html (8,613 bytes)
8. Re: Recap on 'World Records Topic' (score: 1): Author: "\"LandSpeed\" Louise Ann Noeth" <lanspeed@west.net>; Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 23:45:26 -0800; no 1%? Hmmm, something to chew on, and while I agree the records are tough to achieve, I wonder if the record is really that much more difficult, or is it just our perception? I often notice that we; /html/land-speed/2001-02/msg00151.html (10,962 bytes)
9. Re: Recap on 'World Records Topic' (score: 1): Author: "\"LandSpeed\" Louise Ann Noeth" <lanspeed@west.net>; Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 23:43:17 -0800; Ooooo and you ought to see what women dream of . . . Ha! Speedy Regards, "LandSpeed" Louise Ann Noeth LandSpeed Productions Telling stories with words and pictures --o0o-- -- Original Message -- From; /html/land-speed/2001-02/msg00152.html (9,700 bytes)
10. Re: Recap on 'World Records Topic' (score: 1): Author: "\"LandSpeed\" Louise Ann Noeth" <lanspeed@west.net>; Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 23:50:51 -0800; Do we need another face on the Sphinx? Naw, but I believe this riddle is one we can solve! Speedy Regards, "LandSpeed" Louise Ann Noeth LandSpeed Productions Telling stories with words and pictures -; /html/land-speed/2001-02/msg00155.html (10,027 bytes)
11. Re: Recap on 'World Records Topic' (score: 1): Author: tim schoeny <tschoen@fuse.net>; Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 06:08:40 -0500; Ok lets try a real-world test of this idea this Spring.I'll try to take out a current SCTA/BNI record that was set at B'ville-but I'll do it at Maxton by at least 1% and make a backup run(in the same; /html/land-speed/2001-02/msg00158.html (19,518 bytes)
12. Re: Recap on 'World Records Topic' (score: 1): Author: Want1937hd@aol.com; Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 08:41:16 EST; << I often notice that we of the present make judgments about the past based on the standards of today. >> That statement needs to cast in bronze! So true.Bob /// /// land-speed@autox.team.net mailin; /html/land-speed/2001-02/msg00165.html (9,069 bytes)
13. Re: Recap on 'World Records Topic' (score: 1): Author: Nt788@aol.com; Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 11:55:52 EST; Tim I'm not interested! Jack /// /// land-speed@autox.team.net mailing list ///; /html/land-speed/2001-02/msg00172.html (8,840 bytes)
14. Re: Recap on 'World Records Topic' (score: 1): Author: tim schoeny <tschoen@fuse.net>; Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 15:09:44 -0500; Come on Jack loosen up a bit-I saw where you EVEN agreed with Dave on something! /// /// land-speed@autox.team.net mailing list ///; /html/land-speed/2001-02/msg00181.html (8,960 bytes)
15. Re: Recap on 'World Records Topic' (score: 1): Author: "Mike Jenkins" <MikeJ@speedrecordclub.softnet.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 20:09:29 -0000; As far as I am concerned, the 1% rule is an attempt to level out some of the other factors like wind, temperature, etc. For example, if I had just set a record at 200.201mph (I wish!), with still co; /html/land-speed/2001-02/msg00182.html (9,622 bytes)
16. Re: Recap on 'World Records Topic' (score: 1): Author: tim schoeny <tschoen@fuse.net>; Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 16:37:35 -0500; I kinda like Welch's grape jelly.All I was trying to do was give those interested in the subject a real world example of the kinds of challanges they will face in getting this idea off the ground-it; /html/land-speed/2001-02/msg00183.html (10,978 bytes)
17. Re: Recap on 'World Records Topic' (score: 1): Author: tim schoeny <tschoen@fuse.net>; Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 16:45:37 -0500; I kinda like Welch's grape jelly.All I was trying to do was give those interested in the subject a real world example of the kinds of challanges they will face in getting this idea off the ground-it; /html/land-speed/2001-02/msg00185.html (11,128 bytes)
18. Re: Recap on 'World Records Topic' (score: 1): Author: Joe Amo <jkamo@rapidnet.com>; Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 20:49:34 -0700; Tim, Respectfully, please remember you cant "take out a current SCTA/BNI record" with a pass at Maxton. 132 speed trap is FAR from a 5280 ft speed trap. Joe :) /// /// land-speed@autox.team.net maili; /html/land-speed/2001-02/msg00193.html (20,780 bytes)
19. Re: Recap on 'World Records Topic' (score: 1): Author: tim schoeny <tschoen@fuse.net>; Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2001 08:31:00 -0500; Well I'm not sure if you got my point ,but I'm very sure I no longer get the point of this endeavor from your perspective.I have no desire to "unseat" anyone's B'ville record by running over it at Ma; /html/land-speed/2001-02/msg00228.html (27,358 bytes)
20. Re: Recap on 'World Records Topic' (score: 1): Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>; Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 17:11:42 -0600; Lets take all of this to the NEW LIST ... John has created at to subscribe write a letter to majordomo@landracing.com and in the body type.... subscribe world-records That easy and we can keep this l; /html/land-speed/2001-02/msg00241.html (7,959 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]