Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Record\s+Question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Record\s+Question\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. Record Question (score: 1): Author: "Dan" <dwarner@electrorent.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 12:33:40 -0700; The Fuel Modified Sports class was instituted in 2002. Yet I see that a car that ran in 1998 set a record in 1998 using a B motor and that has some how translated to a D sized record in 2003 record l; /html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00617.html (7,759 bytes)
2. Record Question (score: 1): Author: "rgribble" <rgribble@carolina.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 00:26:44 -0500; Someone asked me this today and I didn't have an answer. I guess I could find this out by reading my rule book but it's easier to ask someone who knows... Assuming, your speed is record quality, and; /html/land-speed/2002-04/msg00060.html (7,946 bytes)
3. Re: Record Question (score: 1): Author: ARDUNDOUG@aol.com; Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 00:39:03 EST; Grib, On the Long Course the speed on any timed mile can be considered as a qualifying time. On the Short Course you only have one timed mile to contend with. The 1/4 mile trap in the first timed mil; /html/land-speed/2002-04/msg00061.html (8,848 bytes)
4. Re: Record Question (score: 1): Author: W S Potter <wester6935@attbi.com>; Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 04:01:53 -0800; Doug is right ... and when we get back on the long course so we can run both ways it will revert to the old rules, same piece of real estate, for the record, That's the way we used to do it. Same as; /html/land-speed/2002-04/msg00063.html (9,045 bytes)
5. Re: Record Question (score: 1): Author: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>; Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 07:17:39 -0800; At Bonneville, you qualify on a record in any timed mile where you exceed the existing record speed. That same mile is the mile that will be averaged on the return/backup run. ie. if you qualify in; /html/land-speed/2002-04/msg00069.html (8,944 bytes)
6. Re: Record Question (score: 1): Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>; Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 09:22:15 -0600; I don't mean to belabor this.... but a curious question arises.... If I was over the record in the middle mile but on the return run missed it by say one mile an hour but picked it up in the last mil; /html/land-speed/2002-04/msg00070.html (9,830 bytes)
7. Re: Record Question (score: 1): Author: "Glen Barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net>; Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 08:11:58 -0800; The record must be in the same mile on the long course. Glen -- Original Message -- From: "rgribble" <rgribble@carolina.rr.com> To: <land-speed@autox.team.net> Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 9:26 P; /html/land-speed/2002-04/msg00073.html (8,978 bytes)
8. Re: Record Question (score: 1): Author: ARDUNDOUG@aol.com; Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 11:43:19 EST; Keith, It depends on your two-way average for any given mile. If your two-way average for any given mile is over the existing record you may proceed to impound and hopefully collect your prize. If no; /html/land-speed/2002-04/msg00075.html (8,734 bytes)
9. Re: Record Question (score: 1): Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>; Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 10:57:19 -0600; Okay Doug.... what I understand then is even if I qualified in the middle mile I could actually end up setting the record in the last mile if the actual average speed of the two passes was over the r; /html/land-speed/2002-04/msg00077.html (9,542 bytes)
10. Re: Record Question (score: 1): Author: "Glen Barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net>; Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 09:45:13 -0800; to /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/land-speed; /html/land-speed/2002-04/msg00080.html (10,319 bytes)
11. Re: Record Question (score: 1): Author: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>; Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 09:41:54 -0800; My understanding is that a return record run would not be recognized as a qualifying attempt. Others on the list could be more definite on this, I am sure. Tom /// unsubscribe/change address request; /html/land-speed/2002-04/msg00081.html (10,608 bytes)
12. Re: Record Question (score: 1): Author: Joe Amo <jkamo@rap.midco.net>; Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 10:48:22 -0700; What if you exceed the existing record on the return road??? Joe /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Archives at ht; /html/land-speed/2002-04/msg00082.html (10,549 bytes)
13. Re: Record Question (score: 1): Author: Joe Amo <jkamo@rap.midco.net>; Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 10:58:30 -0700; Doug remember its not just having a two way average in a given mile over the existing record......... all qualifing miles must be over the record 1st Joe :) /// unsubscribe/change address requests to; /html/land-speed/2002-04/msg00083.html (9,334 bytes)
14. RE: Record Question (score: 1): Author: "Clay, Dale" <Dale.Clay@mdhelicopters.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 11:12:28 -0700; BAD RACER!!! BAD RACER!!! Dale C. :-) What if you exceed the existing record on the return road??? Joe -- The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addresse; /html/land-speed/2002-04/msg00084.html (9,020 bytes)
15. Re: Record Question (score: 1): Author: ARDUNDOUG@aol.com; Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 13:36:25 EST; Joe, That's not my understanding of the process. I don't believe that all the miles on your qualifying pass must be over the record before you are permitted to run the second pass. If any of the time; /html/land-speed/2002-04/msg00087.html (8,779 bytes)
16. Re: Record Question (score: 1): Author: Joe Amo <jkamo@rap.midco.net>; Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 12:49:58 -0700; This is a GREAT example of how inadequate internet commo can be :):) Doug, as you well know a "qualifier" or "qualifying mile" is a mile average in excess of the record, so when I say all qualifiers; /html/land-speed/2002-04/msg00091.html (9,489 bytes)
17. Fwd: Record Question (score: 1): Author: ARDUNDOUG@aol.com; Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 21:16:02 EST; Return-path: <ARDUNDOUG@aol.com> From: ARDUNDOUG@aol.com Full-name: ARDUN DOUG Message-ID: <186.60363e3.29de6018@aol.com> Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 21:04:08 EST Subject: Re: Record Question To: jkamo@rap; /html/land-speed/2002-04/msg00095.html (8,370 bytes)
18. RE: Record Question (score: 1): Author: "rgribble" <rgribble@carolina.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 22:38:38 -0500; "Do what others Won't and you'll do what others Can't for the rest of your life" Thanks to all who responded, I believe I have my answer. Grib /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@aut; /html/land-speed/2002-04/msg00097.html (7,856 bytes)
19. record question (score: 1): Author: "Dan" <dwarner@electrorent.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 05:13:50 -0800; what I understand then is even if I qualified in the middle mile I could actually end up setting the record in the last mile if the actual average speed of the two passes was over the record..... **; /html/land-speed/2002-04/msg00100.html (7,941 bytes)
20. record question (score: 1): Author: "Dan" <dwarner@electrorent.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 05:25:00 -0800; Just for clarification of what I think I picked out of an earlier post, do BOTH times have to be above the old record or only the average? ** Only the average across the same mile as the qualifier. D; /html/land-speed/2002-04/msg00102.html (7,676 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]