Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Replacing\s+Chrome\s+Leaf\s+springs\s+with\s+Rubber\s+Leafs\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Replacing\s+Chrome\s+Leaf\s+springs\s+with\s+Rubber\s+Leafs\.\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Replacing Chrome Leaf springs with Rubber Leafs. (score: 1): Author: "Andrew B. Lundgren" <lundgren@iname.com>; Date: Tue, 07 Jul 1998 19:59:06 -0600; I am about to replace my Chrome bumper B's broken leaf spings with a set from a RBB. Any reason why I should not do this? Thanks! Andrew Lundgren Lundgren@iname.com http://www.itwest.net/~lundgren; /html/mgs/1998-07/msg00349.html (7,598 bytes)
2. Re: Replacing Chrome Leaf springs with Rubber Leafs. (score: 1): Author: "Harlan Jillson" <hjillson@argolink.net>; Date: Wed, 8 Jul 1998 21:32:01 -0500; I've been waiting for someone better in the know to answer you on this one today, but so far no takers, so here goes my $0.02. One of the changes when the RBB design came along was an increase in ri; /html/mgs/1998-07/msg00390.html (8,696 bytes)
3. Re: Replacing Chrome Leaf springs with Rubber Leafs. (score: 1): Author: "Henry D. Reynolds" <hdr@jump.net>; Date: Wed, 8 Jul 1998 22:58:57 -0500 (CDT); I want to do the opposite replace the leaf springs on my RBB to restore early-model ride height. I was told by a local ''MG-spesialisten'' that this would lower the car to pre-RBB ride height (only a; /html/mgs/1998-07/msg00396.html (7,791 bytes)
4. Re: Replacing Chrome Leaf springs with Rubber Leafs. (score: 1): Author: "Andrew B. Lundgren" <lundgren@iname.com>; Date: Wed, 08 Jul 1998 23:55:47 -0600; Now ya tell me! :) I have the drivers side installed already. I am thinking that with the sag that these used springs I am installing probably have the ride height shouldn't be that much higher from; /html/mgs/1998-07/msg00404.html (8,491 bytes)
5. Re: Replacing Chrome Leaf springs with Rubber Leafs. (score: 1): Author: Paul Hunt <paul.hunt1@virgin.net>; Date: Thu, 09 Jul 1998 19:12:27 +0000; I did this to reduce tyre-rub on the rear arches following a conversion from Rostyles to wires - it was successful. While I was at it I changed the front springs as well. A beneficial side-effect was; /html/mgs/1998-07/msg00427.html (8,069 bytes)
6. Re: Replacing Chrome Leaf springs with Rubber Leafs. (score: 1): Author: Paul Hunt <paul.hunt1@virgin.net>; Date: Thu, 09 Jul 1998 20:21:13 +0000; The height difference came about mainly through chassis changes, although rear springs are also harder to cope with the extra weight so the car sits a little higher (about 1/2 inch). The fronts are h; /html/mgs/1998-07/msg00433.html (8,393 bytes)
7. Re: Replacing Chrome Leaf springs with Rubber Leafs. (score: 1): Author: "Palmer Family" <amesfolks@snovalley.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 12:17:24 -0700; front dive. is a Sounds like just what I want in my teenage car!! :-) signed, BARRY PALMER amesfolks@snovalley.com 72 MG Midget (Sparky) http://members.xoom.com/mgboy; /html/mgs/1998-07/msg00437.html (7,996 bytes)
8. Re: Replacing Chrome Leaf springs with Rubber Leafs. (score: 1): Author: Steve Darby <elan@highfiber.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Jul 1998 19:47:55 -0700; the only difference in the springs is they are stiffer to carry the RUBBER BUMPERS. the hight difference is in the mounting brackets. Steve Darby; /html/mgs/1998-07/msg00501.html (9,045 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]