Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Roadster\s+Aerodynamics\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Roadster\s+Aerodynamics\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Roadster Aerodynamics (score: 1): Author: Dick J <lsr_man@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 05:54:51 -0800 (PST); Tim, what about the American Bantam body? It's smaller, and isn't too practical for a V-8 powered car, but with Honda front wheel drive, it seems like it could be worked in real well. All the power t; /html/land-speed/2000-12/msg00005.html (8,292 bytes)
2. Re: Roadster Aerodynamics (score: 1): Author: Tim Schoeny <tschoen@fuse.net>; Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 10:56:15 -0500; Hmmmmm,forgot about that one-anyone know where I can get some dimensions?Cincy isn't exactly Bantam central.Thanks for the idea.Hey Dan,are these legal for MR?; /html/land-speed/2000-12/msg00011.html (8,836 bytes)
3. Re: Roadster Aerodynamics (score: 1): Author: Dick J <lsr_man@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 07:58:48 -0800 (PST); The Speedway catalog has some dimensions, but I don't have one here at work. Dick J __________________________________________________ == * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dick J * * (In East Texas) * *; /html/land-speed/2000-12/msg00012.html (9,809 bytes)
4. Re: Roadster Aerodynamics (score: 1): Author: "Jim Dincau" <jdincau@qnet.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 07:59:23 -0800; Might be a good choice, the Bantam is as narrow or narrower than a 27 but it may be a little taller. You would end up with similar frontal area but it might be easier to hide the driver. Jim; /html/land-speed/2000-12/msg00013.html (9,204 bytes)
5. Re: Roadster Aerodynamics (score: 1): Author: Dale_Krumheuer@ars.aon.com; Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 10:55:51 -0600; You may want to try Rod 'n Race Fiberglass , they make a 32 Bantam and a later A-40 Austin. Good people, they also have a P-38 belly tank available and chassis for same. http://www.hrww.com/rnr/p-38.; /html/land-speed/2000-12/msg00019.html (9,409 bytes)
6. Re: Roadster Aerodynamics (score: 1): Author: "Dan Warner" <dwarner@electrorent.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 09:21:48 -0800; Email J D Tone, gmc6power@earthlink.net JD runs one in F/G roadster class with great sucess. He will have all the info you need. Yes, they are legal as long as the body is AMERICAN Bantam. Dan -- Or; /html/land-speed/2000-12/msg00021.html (9,628 bytes)
7. Re: Roadster Aerodynamics (score: 1): Author: FastmetalBDF@aol.com; Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 13:53:37 EST; Tim, One of my best friends has a REAL STEEL Bantam roadster, a complete car that he last drove ( on the street ) about two years ago . It is powered by, of all things, a Ford V8 60 flathead, and was; /html/land-speed/2000-12/msg00025.html (7,828 bytes)
8. Roadster Aerodynamics (score: 1): Author: Tim Schoeny <tschoen@fuse.net>; Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 17:26:18 -0500; Ok it's cold here now so I'm sit'n inside at the drawing board working on my long term dream project- the front wheel drive H/GMR(Honda powered of course).Seems there are three body styles that are p; /html/land-speed/2000-11/msg00981.html (6,856 bytes)
9. Re: Roadster Aerodynamics (score: 1): Author: "Jim Dincau" <jdincau@qnet.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 14:44:08 -0800; A brick is a brick is a brick. The only way to streamline em is to mount em backwards and you can't do that. I would go with minimum frontal area. Jim in Palmdale; /html/land-speed/2000-11/msg00982.html (7,357 bytes)
10. Re: Roadster Aerodynamics (score: 1): Author: FastmetalBDF@aol.com; Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 19:16:53 EST; Tim, if you were to look back at the magazines and books showing the cars run at the lakes since the pre war years, and at Bonneville since 1949, I believe you will find that in the modified roadster; /html/land-speed/2000-11/msg00983.html (9,324 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]