Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rocket\s+science\s+theory\s+vs\s+real\s+experience\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rocket\s+science\s+theory\s+vs\s+real\s+experience\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Rocket science theory vs real experience (score: 1): Author: <dbinkley@cox.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:32:11 -0700; The original question was : Two virtually identical cars (or the same car if it helps), one at sea level and one at 6,000' elevation. 80 degree day in both locations, exact same driving, exact same h; /html/tigers/2007-06/msg00068.html (6,233 bytes)
2. Rocket science theory vs real experience (score: 1): Author: Carmods@aol.com; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:35:06 EDT; FWIW, in my Tiger, I have seen no difference in operating temps of the engine between sea level along the CA coast and Flagstaff, AZ at 7500' above sea level at similar ambient conditions, same drivi; /html/tigers/2007-06/msg00070.html (6,755 bytes)
3. Re: Rocket science theory vs real experience (score: 1): Author: <e.coiner@cox.net>; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:51:46 -0700; Thanks for the real world experience. The way I would answer the original question is this: Assuming the coolant system has margin and the thermostat is working, the temps should be the same. For a c; /html/tigers/2007-06/msg00076.html (7,508 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]