- 1. Rod Bearing Survey (score: 1)
- Author: "Jack W. Drews" <vinttr4@geneseo.net>
- Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 16:10:46 -0600
- Thanks to all who contributed to our collective knowledge on the subject of "which rods fail first". There have been a number of responses since I sent out the first results, and the pattern is signi
- /html/fot/2005-12/msg00199.html (8,080 bytes)
- 2. RE: Rod Bearing Survey (score: 1)
- Author: "Richard Taylor" <tarch@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 08:39:50 -0500
- The crankshaft I broke at VIR last year was at the #3 journal. Is it of value to correlate crankshaft failure locations along with rod failures? Richard Taylor (TR-4) == unsubscribe/change address r
- /html/fot/2005-12/msg00204.html (6,846 bytes)
- 3. Re: Rod Bearing Survey (score: 1)
- Author: Larry Young <larry.young@pobox.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 08:24:30 -0600
- Jack, what was the breakdown between the three failure modes - rod, == unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net
- /html/fot/2005-12/msg00205.html (8,625 bytes)
- 4. Re: Rod Bearing Survey (score: 1)
- Author: Fubog1@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:27:38 EST
- Jack, what was the breakdown between the three failure modes - rod, bolt, bearing? ... to add to that question, what actually CAUSED that particular failure? Glen == unsubscribe/change address reques
- /html/fot/2005-12/msg00208.html (6,824 bytes)
- 5. Re: Rod Bearing Survey (score: 1)
- Author: WEmery7451@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 17:44:40 EST
- << Tally: I am surprised that the No. 3 rod has the No. 2 rod beat in number of incidents. I believe that I have about four old cranks kicking around the garage showing that the No. 2 rod bearing spu
- /html/fot/2005-12/msg00210.html (7,534 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu