Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rod\s+Length\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rod\s+Length\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Rod length (score: 1): Author: Carmods@aol.com; Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1998 13:16:08 EDT; It's all part of a system! Longer rod to stroke ratios reduce forces on rods, pistons, bearings, cranks and blocks thereby allowing lighter rods, lighter pistons, smaller bearings, lighter block stru; /html/tigers/1998-10/msg00079.html (6,673 bytes)
2. Re: Rod length (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <laifman@flash.net>; Date: Mon, 05 Oct 1998 12:10:12 -0700; But John, They used heavier rods (thicker section/longer), standard bearing sizes, same weight block structure. I'll give you lighter pistons, which makes sense about reducing loads and inertia of re; /html/tigers/1998-10/msg00087.html (7,753 bytes)
3. Re: Rod length (score: 1): Author: DrMayf@aol.com; Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1998 15:29:59 EDT; show us the data which support these claims. I agree with alomost everything except the lighter rods. Because they are longer, they have to be stronger with larger cross section and mmoment of inerti; /html/tigers/1998-10/msg00092.html (6,714 bytes)
4. Re: Rod length (score: 1): Author: Carmods@aol.com; Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1998 09:59:57 EDT; Someone asked why Ford used a higher rod-to-stroke ratio on their new engines such as the 4.6 L. so I was just trying to reply. John Logan; /html/tigers/1998-10/msg00106.html (6,477 bytes)
5. Re: Rod length (score: 1): Author: nfgjr@juno.com; Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1998 15:28:42 -0400; Mayby I'm mistaken but I allways thought the rod length had more to do with RPM range of the engine. The Garlands nfgjr@juno.com or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]; /html/tigers/1998-10/msg00112.html (6,977 bytes)
6. Rod Length (score: 1): Author: rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu (Bob Palmer); Date: Tue, 9 Sep 97 15:24:58 PDT; Recently, one of you out there mentioned using 289 rods in a 302 to improve torque. At least I remember something along those lines. Here's another subject we could probably spend days on and perhap; /html/tigers/1997-09/msg00166.html (9,904 bytes)
7. Re: Rod Length (score: 1): Author: brockctella@juno.com (Brock C Tella); Date: Tue, 9 Sep 1997 18:04:39 -0700; /html/tigers/1997-09/msg00168.html (11,134 bytes)
8. Rod Length (score: 1): Author: Bill Gegg <billgegg@ci.antioch.ca.us>; Date: Wed, 10 Sep 1997 08:23:09 -0700; Bob Palmer wrote: I think a solid case can be made for longer rod length in terms of reducing stress and allowing higher rpm operation. I have a difficult time with the concept of increasing rod leng; /html/tigers/1997-09/msg00178.html (7,718 bytes)
9. Re: Rod Length (score: 1): Author: Spook37211@aol.com; Date: Wed, 10 Sep 1997 14:46:27 -0400 (EDT); << Guys, Recently, one of you out there mentioned using 289 rods in a 302 to improve torque. At least I remember something along those lines. Here's another subject we could probably spend days on an; /html/tigers/1997-09/msg00183.html (11,304 bytes)
10. RE: Rod Length (score: 1): Author: "Richard Atherton (Entex)" <a-richat@MICROSOFT.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 03:03:12 -0700; Actually, longer rods reduce the piston speed, and angular force against the cylinder wall. However, They may weigh more. Shorter rods can increase torque due to the sharper angle the rod will have t; /html/tigers/1997-09/msg00189.html (8,806 bytes)
11. Re: Rod Length (score: 1): Author: RPalmerBob@aol.com; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 11:31:12 -0400 (EDT); Thanks for the response. Let's see, currently I think we have one vote for more torque with shorter rods and one vote for more torque with longer rods. Any more votes out there? Whichever answer is; /html/tigers/1997-09/msg00191.html (7,871 bytes)
12. Re: Rod Length (score: 1): Author: briden@norcross.mcs.slb.com; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 12:29:27 -0400; I am a layman and not an engineer, but I have been reading this thread with some interest. Now though, I feel compelled to ask a question (albeit naive it may be). So please educate a few of us. You; /html/tigers/1997-09/msg00196.html (8,723 bytes)
13. Re: Rod Length (score: 1): Author: rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu (Bob Palmer); Date: Thu, 11 Sep 97 10:07:39 PDT; Since I brought this topic up, maybe I should try and answer you. As Brock Tella says, I should probably draw a picture, but let's see if I can make do with a few choice words. The effect of rod len; /html/tigers/1997-09/msg00197.html (9,054 bytes)
14. Re: Rod Length (score: 1): Author: richards@northcoast.com; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 20:34:45 -0700; short stroke-better lowend torque....longer stroke-better mid to high end rpm torque...these are measured in foot lbs; /html/tigers/1997-09/msg00208.html (8,246 bytes)
15. Re: Rod Length (score: 1): Author: brockctella@juno.com (Brock C Tella); Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 13:26:04 -0700; /html/tigers/1997-09/msg00210.html (9,722 bytes)
16. Re: Rod Length (score: 1): Author: CoolVT@aol.com; Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 17:21:04 -0400 (EDT); Hot Rod magazine did an article 3 or 4 months ago on this subject. The title was something like "The Chevy 350 that General Motors should have built". I believe there were dyno test on this motor. If; /html/tigers/1997-09/msg00220.html (7,556 bytes)
17. RE: Rod Length (score: 1): Author: "Richard Atherton (Entex)" <a-richat@MICROSOFT.com>; Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 01:15:21 -0700; Actually it comes down to mechanics. You need to visualise a single cylinder engine in you mind. OK. Now put it at top dead center, and give it a very long rod. Now slowly rotate the crank pulling th; /html/tigers/1997-09/msg00230.html (10,181 bytes)
18. Re: Rod Length (score: 1): Author: rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu (Bob Palmer); Date: Mon, 15 Sep 97 14:09:57 PDT; "Ford,on the other hand, has remained with the 'oversquare' philosophy of large bore and short stroke, high-winding performance. So when comparing the Fort to the Chevy, you must understand that no; /html/tigers/1997-09/msg00246.html (11,532 bytes)
19. Re: Rod Length (score: 1): Author: Jim Parent <jimparent@compuserve.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Sep 1997 21:42:16 -0400; Two articles (sidebars) on this subject are currently on your newstands. 1) Hot Rod Car Craft "200 Power & performance tips" page 69 and part of a= n article entitled "Power secrets from the Pros". B; /html/tigers/1997-09/msg00275.html (9,002 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 19
Page: [1]