Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rotary\s+Engines\s+$was\s+Re\:\s+New\s+Category$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rotary\s+Engines\s+$was\s+Re\:\s+New\s+Category$\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. Rotary Engines (was Re: New Category) (score: 1): Author: DrMayf@aol.com; Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 11:05:45 EDT; I really know squat aboit hummer engines, but it seems to me that the engines of any sort should have equivalent displacements. For instance, my 302 Fors has well, 302 CID, right? Well a hummer engin; /html/land-speed/2000-09/msg00343.html (8,228 bytes)
2. Re: Rotary Engines (was Re: New Category) (score: 1): Author: dahlgren <dahlgren@uconect.net>; Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 11:57:43 -0400; If the technology is better than a piston engine whats that got to do with anything???? do we have a handicap for a twin cam engine ?? How about a hemi handicap how would that go over.. i think every; /html/land-speed/2000-09/msg00347.html (8,947 bytes)
3. Re: Rotary Engines (was Re: New Category) (score: 1): Author: V4GR@aol.com; Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 14:39:02 EDT; Perhaps the distinction should be reciprocating engines verses rotating engines. Then the Wankel engines would run with the turbines. Rich Fox; /html/land-speed/2000-09/msg00354.html (7,910 bytes)
4. Re: Rotary Engines (was Re: New Category) (score: 1): Author: dahlgren <dahlgren@uconect.net>; Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 15:03:54 -0400; To be candid with you a rotary is not like a turbine in that it does not purely rotate. The eccentric shaft gets it forces from the rotor going around a statioary gear in a wobble sort of motion and; /html/land-speed/2000-09/msg00355.html (8,862 bytes)
5. Re: Rotary Engines (was Re: New Category) (score: 1): Author: dahlgren <dahlgren@uconect.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 07:48:27 -0400; heads up might be an advantage but it is an advantage to the 2 strokes to run heads up too.. at 2.1 or 2.0 they would move to an F car.. It seems appropriate that if FIA and SCCA both use a factor of; /html/land-speed/2000-09/msg00372.html (11,550 bytes)
6. Re: Rotary Engines (was Re: New Category) (score: 1): Author: "Dan Warner" <dwarner@electrorent.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 05:04:09 -0700; Another question, exactly which cars would this bring back out? Do you want to race against Racing Beat in a lower class? I can see the cars that would come back if the new category is put into place; /html/land-speed/2000-09/msg00373.html (12,746 bytes)
7. Re: Rotary Engines (was Re: New Category) (score: 1): Author: dahlgren <dahlgren@uconect.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 08:25:29 -0400; Dan whether it may or may not bring a car back is not really the question is it?? The question is the factor fair .... The question is how do i present this for a fair consdieration to the factor and; /html/land-speed/2000-09/msg00374.html (14,810 bytes)
8. Re: Rotary Engines (was Re: New Category) (score: 1): Author: "Dan Warner" <dwarner@electrorent.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 05:40:14 -0700; Write it up in the form you want. Email to me and I will put it on the table at the rules meetings next month. Dan -- Original Message -- From: dahlgren <dahlgren@uconect.net> To: Dan Warner <dwarne; /html/land-speed/2000-09/msg00375.html (15,878 bytes)
9. Re: Rotary Engines (was Re: New Category) (score: 1): Author: dahlgren <dahlgren@uconect.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 08:45:28 -0400; Will do when is the meeting so i am sure to have it to you in time. Does this also have to be done for usfra or do the rules always parallel each other I am not sure to the distriction between SCRA a; /html/land-speed/2000-09/msg00377.html (17,001 bytes)
10. Re: Rotary Engines (was Re: New Category) (score: 1): Author: "Dan Warner" <dwarner@electrorent.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 06:21:13 -0700; The meetings will take place in November, dates not yet set. The USFRA and ECTA use the SCTA/BNI rulebook for their events. There are some minor exceptions such as the USFRA 130 & 150 clubs and the S; /html/land-speed/2000-09/msg00379.html (18,362 bytes)
11. Re: Rotary Engines (was Re: New Category) (score: 1): Author: "Bryan A. Savage Jr" <basavage@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 06:40:40 -0700; Hello Dan. I believe Dave Dahlgren has a point. Back when my '77 rule book was published with the "EV" formula, even Ferrari didn't have a street legal 2 Liter 240 HP motor like the Honda S2000. I kn; /html/land-speed/2000-09/msg00382.html (9,181 bytes)
12. Re: Rotary Engines (was Re: New Category) (score: 1): Author: V4GR@aol.com; Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 12:10:51 EDT; Many years ago I raced an Alfa in E and F production, as I remember, at SCCA events. At that time cars were classified by actual observed performance over a period of time. Modified was different, I; /html/land-speed/2000-09/msg00385.html (8,632 bytes)
13. Re: Rotary Engines (was Re: New Category) (score: 1): Author: Joe Amo <jkamo@rapidnet.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 10:41:32 -0600; Dan, I emphatically feel that the engine classification parameters may just be the most important (second only to safety) aspect of the land speed racing rules. I think the handicapping issue with re; /html/land-speed/2000-09/msg00386.html (14,294 bytes)
14. Re: Rotary Engines (was Re: New Category) (score: 1): Author: Dick J <lsr_man@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 09:29:42 -0700 (PDT); Dan, you're a good man! I'm not concerned with this issue at all, (I have enough trouble keeping a flathead running, much less a motor where the pistons go in circles instead of up and down.) but I'v; /html/land-speed/2000-09/msg00387.html (8,872 bytes)
15. Re: Rotary Engines (was Re: New Category) (score: 1): Author: "Beverly Stanley" <beverlycst@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 18:5:51 -0700; Ok Dan - the first thing I am doing Saturday is going over to the registration trailer and filling out a "rules change request form" - I am going to attach (if I can) a copy of the e-mails where Dave; /html/land-speed/2000-09/msg00397.html (15,542 bytes)
16. Re: Rotary Engines (was Re: New Category) (score: 1): Author: Chuck Rothfuss <crothfuss@coastalnet.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 00:01:43 -0400; Fellow Racers, I've very much enjoyed the spirited exchanges concerning my beloved rotary engines. Outboard motors? 2 cycles? Turbines?! Geeze, this is a creative crowd! Now if anyone has better data; /html/land-speed/2000-09/msg00400.html (11,483 bytes)
17. RE: Rotary Engines (was Re: New Category) (score: 1): Author: "Smith, Simon-Pierre" <Simon-Pierre.Smith@PSS.Boeing.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 21:12:56 -0700; All this talk of rotaries reminds me of an ad I saw in our local classifieds for a mini hydroplane with an NSU Prinz rotary engine. I still wish I'd gotten the thing. I don't know why - just like old; /html/land-speed/2000-09/msg00402.html (9,782 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]