Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rotating\s+Mass\s+Unladen\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rotating\s+Mass\s+Unladen\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Rotating Mass Unladen (score: 1): Author: "steve bridge" <slbridge@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 18:18:09 +0000; Hello all, I emailed a Professor of Mechanical Engineering and asked him about this subject. Of course, I got more questions, but I expected that. Here is what we have so far, I told hime it was a TR; /html/6pack/2004-01/msg00307.html (6,629 bytes)
2. Re: Rotating Mass Unladen (score: 1): Author: "Kai M. Radicke" <kai@radiohead.net>; Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 19:00:17 -0500; Good discussion, but I have to start off with this first... (my little rant about current American engineering mindsets) The reply below was a typical irrelevant response from an engineer, failing to; /html/6pack/2004-01/msg00314.html (12,770 bytes)
3. Re: Rotating Mass Unladen (score: 1): Author: "Kai M. Radicke" <kai@radiohead.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 12:22:07 -0500; It is a good thing, you have to remember that the rest of the rotating bottom end still weighs close to 100lbs when it is assembled... so the percentage you save is only on the order of 10% or so, r; /html/6pack/2004-01/msg00319.html (7,586 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]