Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rotoflex\s+rear\s+suspension\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rotoflex\s+rear\s+suspension\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Rotoflex rear suspension (score: 1): Author: "R. John Lye" <rjl6n@virginia.edu>; Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1998 08:22:23; Hi all, This weekend I discovered a problem with my GT-6+ (Rotoflex suspension). About a year ago, I developed a clunking sound like a u-joint going out (except maybe a bit louder)from the right rear; /html/fot/1998-04/msg00046.html (7,888 bytes)
2. Re: Rotoflex rear suspension (score: 1): Author: "R. John Lye" <rjl6n@virginia.edu>; Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1998 09:09:51; No, I didn't. Hmmm, that might be it - they might have been compromised. I just used a bolt from the replacement axle, so it should have been the same as what was in there. They are a slightly unusua; /html/fot/1998-04/msg00047.html (7,748 bytes)
3. Re: Rotoflex rear suspension (score: 1): Author: Bob Lang <LANG@ISIS.MIT.EDU>; Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1998 10:09:41 -0400 (EDT); [stuff deleted] I can't comment on the frequency of this repair, but I'll presume that you are not doing "smokey burnouts" at the local burger joint.... ;-) Barry Schwartz (of Ford V-6 powered fame); /html/fot/1998-04/msg00049.html (8,352 bytes)
4. RE: Rotoflex rear suspension (score: 1): Author: "Bownes, Robert M. (EXCH)" <RMBOWNES@intermedia.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1998 12:21:01 -0400; My guess: Compromised bolts. Solution: Replace 'em with ARP. Buy the right length and turn down the end with the lathe. iii; /html/fot/1998-04/msg00050.html (7,207 bytes)
5. Re: Rotoflex rear suspension (score: 1): Author: Catpusher <Catpusher@aol.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1998 01:57:02 EDT; << one of the bolts that holds the Rotoflex joint to the outer stub axle had broken, >> <snip> How low is the ride height? Just a guess. Ellie's almost 200,000 mile 1970+ has never done this, with wi; /html/fot/1998-04/msg00056.html (7,822 bytes)
6. Re: Rotoflex rear suspension (score: 1): Author: Russ Moore <rem9@cornell.edu>; Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1998 10:10:08 -0400; The only time I recall hearing of this problem was at the TRF Summer Party 4 years ago. A fellow was saying how it continually was a problem for him. A quick elevation on a jack and visual inspectio; /html/fot/1998-04/msg00057.html (9,069 bytes)
7. Re: Rotoflex rear suspension (score: 1): Author: "R. John Lye" <rjl6n@virginia.edu>; Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1998 10:35:05; Hi Russ, I'm pretty sure that the offending axle is straight, but I'll double check to be sure, thanks. That seems to be the conclusion that I'm coming to. Time to replace it all. That's what I expec; /html/fot/1998-04/msg00058.html (7,827 bytes)
8. Re: Rotoflex rear suspension (score: 1): Author: cak@dimebank.com (Chris Kantarjiev); Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1998 12:16:17 -0700; Certainly many of the Can-Am cars used some version of Rotoflex in their driveline - I know the McLarens did. But I suspect they had a bit better geometry there than Triumph used. I'm always amazed t; /html/fot/1998-04/msg00059.html (7,316 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]