Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Round\s+14\s*$/: 51 ]

Total 51 documents matching your query.

1. Round 14 (score: 1)
Author: "Pat Kelly" <lollipop487@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 20:20:07 -0700
Round 14 results are up. Please take a moment and double check. There are 4 DNWs, and some Fun Runs that left me scratching my head. Take a look so we can get these fixed before I print the paper res
/html/ba-autox/2004-08/msg00014.html (6,478 bytes)

2. RE: Round 14 (score: 1)
Author: John Kelly <76067.1750@compuserve.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 15:51:23 -0400
The results lady tells me an initial count shows we had 209 entries at GGF Also, we had a first, at least to my knowledge. Arriving on the scene was a visitor from the horse race betting emporium up
/html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00029.html (6,619 bytes)

3. Re: Round 14 (score: 1)
Author: John Kelly <76067.1750@compuserve.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2000 11:56:43 -0400
Message text written by James Creasy "lets get rid of the ladies classes while we are at it. :) -james creasy" -- End Original Message -- This negative thought is NOT a good idea. --John Kelly
/html/ba-autox/2000-09/msg00005.html (6,601 bytes)

4. Re: Round 14 (score: 1)
Author: James Creasy <black94pgt@pacbell.net>
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2000 09:33:52 -0700
depends on whether you interpret it as negative or positive. there are arguments on both sides. hey i am a progressive from berzerkely, what do you expect? :) -james
/html/ba-autox/2000-09/msg00009.html (6,875 bytes)

5. Round 14 (score: 1)
Author: John Kelly <76067.1750@compuserve.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 20:52:52 -0400
The turnout for San Francisco Region's Round 14 at Golden Gate Fields, in Albany, CA, was 248 entries. The last car finished at 7:04 p.m. But the most intriguing number to me is: 31 new people joined
/html/ba-autox/2000-08/msg00587.html (7,376 bytes)

6. RE: Round 14 (score: 1)
Author: "Grantz, Sherry" <Sherry.Grantz@Aspect.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 09:40:05 -0700
Actually. John, after going through all the new registrations Monday night before giving them to Pilar I found we had 37 new registrations - some of these were +spouse and +family. This means we hav
/html/ba-autox/2000-08/msg00609.html (9,122 bytes)

7. RE: Round 14 (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly, Katie" <kkelly@spss.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 10:09:49 -0700
Sherry Grantz writes... Before we turn anyone away, I think we should re-examine the necessity of our rookie classes. Katie Kelly
/html/ba-autox/2000-08/msg00611.html (7,552 bytes)

8. RE: Round 14 (score: 1)
Author: "Rob Weinstock" <weinstro@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 17:29:22 GMT
That's an interesting idea. If we are continuously at capacity, then another solution would be to require some form of preregistration, and/or a maximum cap on participants. Another solution is to s
/html/ba-autox/2000-08/msg00612.html (8,820 bytes)

9. Re: Round 14 (score: 1)
Author: James Creasy <black94pgt@pacbell.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 10:50:17 -0700
you may lower attendance, but you will not lose many newbies. more of the serious people will be inclined to drive to sac where you can get 10 runs for less money. one reason i want to drive in SFR
/html/ba-autox/2000-08/msg00614.html (9,933 bytes)

10. Re: Round 14 (score: 1)
Author: Pat Kelly <lollipop@ricochet.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 11:43:39 -0700
Heck, I was thinking we should reduce the entry fee! :-)
/html/ba-autox/2000-08/msg00615.html (10,519 bytes)

11. Re: Round 14 (score: 1)
Author: "Rob Weinstock" <weinstro@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 19:37:53 GMT
I'm not suggesting that we increase barriers to entry for any particular class of competitor, in order to reduce the turnout. If a newbie is serious about autox, and is willing to stick it out, so b
/html/ba-autox/2000-08/msg00617.html (10,735 bytes)

12. Re: Round 14 (score: 1)
Author: ben martinez <brmcapri@usa.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 12:41:13 -0700
Sherry - No! I will be there intill the end of the year! I think I said that at the meeting, well now you know why i'm bailing on REG. it's getting out of control with all of the stuff that REG. has
/html/ba-autox/2000-08/msg00618.html (10,379 bytes)

13. Re: Round 14 (score: 1)
Author: Craig Boyle <craig_boyle@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 13:53:12 -0700 (PDT)
Another way to reduce turnout is to (continue to) schedule against other events on the region. _________________________________________________________________________ == Craig Boyle 95 Mazda Miata
/html/ba-autox/2000-08/msg00619.html (12,613 bytes)

14. RE: Round 14 (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly, Katie" <kkelly@spss.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 13:14:58 -0700
Charlie Davis writes... come Wait a minute, Charlie. Are you saying that the Rookie class makes no impact on attendence? Katie
/html/ba-autox/2000-08/msg00621.html (8,232 bytes)

15. Re: Round 14 (score: 1)
Author: "Darren P. Madams" <darren@madams.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 14:08:57 -0700
How many people were at the NASA event? If we got 248 at GGF competing against that, I don't dare to think what a daylight savings event without competition on a nice day at GGF will be like! Zoiks!
/html/ba-autox/2000-08/msg00624.html (8,351 bytes)

16. Re: Round 14 (score: 1)
Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 17:32:48 EDT
<< Wait a minute, Charlie. Are you saying that the Rookie class makes no impact on attendence? Not at an individual event, no. Over the long run, it might make an impact. I'd bet if we offer no Rooki
/html/ba-autox/2000-08/msg00627.html (8,384 bytes)

17. Re: Round 14 (score: 1)
Author: Derek Butts <pnc1@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 14:27:28 -0700
There was also a Sac Cup event last Sunday too!!! -Derek
/html/ba-autox/2000-08/msg00628.html (8,545 bytes)

18. Re: Round 14 (score: 1)
Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 16:04:02 EDT
<< Before we turn anyone away, I think we should re-examine the necessity of our rookie classes. >> Please elaborate... Now that we have all these people, they're going to come out and run in the Slu
/html/ba-autox/2000-08/msg00632.html (8,184 bytes)

19. Re: Round 14 (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Lahey" <kml@patheticgeek.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 15:33:20 -0700
That'd be all good. Perhaps if we increased the number of drops, that'd also reduce the number of attendees. I know several drivers who were locked in points battles and didn't want to miss a single
/html/ba-autox/2000-08/msg00635.html (8,638 bytes)

20. Re: Round 14 (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Stevens" <kevin_stevens@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 15:59:48 PDT
Conversely, there were those of us who had the races locked up and didn't need to attend, but would have if there were more drops. Better try again. KeS "Where's GGF again?" _________________________
/html/ba-autox/2000-08/msg00637.html (9,503 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu