Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rover\s+3\.5L\,\s+3\.9L\,\s+4\.1L\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rover\s+3\.5L\,\s+3\.9L\,\s+4\.1L\?\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Rover 3.5L, 3.9L, 4.1L? (score: 1): Author: "Scott Gardner" <gardner7@pilot.infi.net>; Date: Sun, 4 Jan 1998 04:00:17 +0000; Speaking of Rover engines, I've seen the 3.5L mentioned all over the place as being a version of the Buick 215, but what are the Rover 3.9L and 4.1L, and where would you find them? Are they distinct; /html/mgs/1998-01/msg00155.html (8,469 bytes)
2. Re: Rover 3.5L, 3.9L, 4.1L? (score: 1): Author: mgb.roadster@juno.com (Larry A Hoy); Date: Sun, 4 Jan 1998 02:22:55 -0700; Scott, the engine was first developed by GM and used in various GM products in 1961-63. Subsequently sold to Rover. The first Rover 3.5L was essentially the same as the Buick engine. Rover upgraded s; /html/mgs/1998-01/msg00157.html (8,798 bytes)
3. Re: Rover 3.5L, 3.9L, 4.1L? (score: 1): Author: Paul Hunt <paul.hunt1@virgin.net>; Date: Sun, 04 Jan 1998 15:28:20 +0000; Costello did early conversions in the UK, predating the factory car. PaulH.; /html/mgs/1998-01/msg00171.html (8,511 bytes)
4. Re: Rover 3.5L, 3.9L, 4.1L? (score: 1): Author: Larry Dickstein <bugide@tfs.net>; Date: Sun, 04 Jan 1998 10:28:08 -0800; The 3.9 and 4.1 Rover motors are later models of the 3.5 liter model. They come in Land Rovers, Range Rovers, and stuff. The advantage of these is that they are aluminum and weigh about what a 4 cyli; /html/mgs/1998-01/msg00172.html (10,020 bytes)
5. Re: Rover 3.5L, 3.9L, 4.1L? (score: 1): Author: mgb.roadster@juno.com (Larry A Hoy); Date: Sun, 4 Jan 1998 11:13:59 -0700; On Sun, 04 Jan 1998 15:28:20 +0000 Paul Hunt <paul.hunt1@virgin.net> In fact I was told he was asked to take a sample conversion to the MG factory so they could take a look at it, which he dutifully; /html/mgs/1998-01/msg00177.html (8,162 bytes)
6. Re: Rover 3.5L, 3.9L, 4.1L? (score: 1): Author: mmcewen@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca (John McEwen); Date: Sun, 4 Jan 1998 12:19:37 -0500; Hi Scott: I would assume that these are later British versions of the original engine, just as GM has later, larger versions of some of its V6 engines. John; /html/mgs/1998-01/msg00181.html (9,194 bytes)
7. Re: Rover 3.5L, 3.9L, 4.1L? (score: 1): Author: Joe Fernandez <JAF@YMH.COM>; Date: Sun, 04 Jan 1998 15:09:15 -0500; Thanks for all the oil suggestions. I removed < 1Qt. of oil and replaced with 3 Qts. Castrol 20w50. My oil pressure guage reads 75 lbs all the time (0 when ignition is off). Do I have a bad guage or; /html/mgs/1998-01/msg00182.html (7,884 bytes)
8. Re: Rover 3.5L, 3.9L, 4.1L? (score: 1): Author: dmeadow@juno.com; Date: Sun, 4 Jan 1998 15:50:47 -0600; See the current issue of MG World for a full discussion of the Costello V-8's, including some words from Mr. Costello himself. He does mention showing one of his conversions to the factory folk, but; /html/mgs/1998-01/msg00194.html (8,802 bytes)
9. Re: Rover 3.5L, 3.9L, 4.1L? (score: 1): Author: mgb.roadster@juno.com (Larry A Hoy); Date: Sun, 4 Jan 1998 16:01:39 -0700; Ok, I checked this story out. After Costello visited Charles Griffin, the Director of Engineering for British Leyland Limited, with his MGB-GT V8 he was asked to take the car to Chairman Lord Stokes.; /html/mgs/1998-01/msg00195.html (10,231 bytes)
10. Re: Rover 3.5L, 3.9L, 4.1L? (score: 1): Author: gofastmg@juno.com (Rick Morrison); Date: Sun, 04 Jan 1998 18:11:31 EST; On Sun, 4 Jan 1998 16:01:39 -0700 mgb.roadster@juno.com (Larry A Hoy) Press and hold ALT then 156. When ALT is released, makes ŁRick Morrison 72 MGBGT 74 Midge; /html/mgs/1998-01/msg00200.html (9,986 bytes)
11. RE: Rover 3.5L, 3.9L, 4.1L? (score: 1): Author: Grant Shirreffs <Grant.S@greatelk.com>; Date: Mon, 5 Jan 1998 12:12:45 +1300; You have to use the numeric keypad when you type the numbers. If = on a laptop, go figure. Alternatively, if you're using Windows 95 or Windows NT, you can use = the Character Map accessory. =3D=3D=3; /html/mgs/1998-01/msg00201.html (11,050 bytes)
12. RE: Rover 3.5L, 3.9L, 4.1L? (score: 1): Author: mmcewen@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca (John McEwen); Date: Sun, 4 Jan 1998 18:00:03 -0500; Hi Grant: Do you have any idea how to do this with a Macintosh? I've tried the usual method to generate the pound symbol but the result doesn't appear in a message although it shows on the screen. Jo; /html/mgs/1998-01/msg00218.html (11,563 bytes)
13. Re: Rover 3.5L, 3.9L, 4.1L? (score: 1): Author: Phil Raby <mgworld@chp.ltd.uk>; Date: Mon, 5 Jan 98 09:34:59 -0000; No, I'd not heard that before either. Sorry David, but you'll be pleased to hear that, due to popular demand you're appearing in Issue Three :-) Philip Raby Editor, MG World PO Box 163, Bicester OX6; /html/mgs/1998-01/msg00265.html (8,311 bytes)
14. Re: Rover 3.5L, 3.9L, 4.1L? (score: 1): Author: dmeadow@juno.com; Date: Mon, 5 Jan 1998 06:59:01 -0600; Glad to hear that Mum's letters arrived! ;-) David Littlefield Houston, TX; /html/mgs/1998-01/msg00268.html (7,873 bytes)
15. Re: Rover 3.5L, 3.9L, 4.1L? (score: 1): Author: gofastmg@juno.com (Rick Morrison); Date: Tue, 06 Jan 1998 20:47:45 EST; Yep, you're right. I forgot that little detail. I use the numeric keypad so often, it is second nature. As for laptops, when I need to make the Pound Sterling symbol, I just ask her to make it for me; /html/mgs/1998-01/msg00474.html (11,569 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]