Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rubber\s+Bump\s+Stop\s+Patent\s+\#55\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rubber\s+Bump\s+Stop\s+Patent\s+\#55\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Rubber Bump Stop Patent #55 (score: 1): Author: Gary Speckman <speckman@coredcs.com>; Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 09:13:47 -0500; As Mike G pointed out, after installing the "wedges" to lower the back of the car, the bump stops HAVE to be modified. He also said 1/4" will lower the car quite a bit, this is true, so dont be tempt; /html/spridgets/1999-07/msg00084.html (8,660 bytes)
2. RE: Rubber Bump Stop Patent #55 (score: 1): Author: "Hanna, Mark" <mhanna@ball.com>; Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 10:57:43 -0600; Are we talking about 1/4 elliptic or 1/2 elliptic cars . And if 1/4 elliptic , where does the wedge spacer go ? Thanks for the info , Mark Hanna AN5L/13731; /html/spridgets/1999-07/msg00091.html (9,659 bytes)
3. Re: Rubber Bump Stop Patent #55 (score: 1): Author: Frank Clarici <spritenut@Exit109.com>; Date: Fri, 02 Jul 1999 21:16:10 -0400; Gar, If you get new (chinese steel) rear springs, you can wedge then 6-8" and it will still be too high. Seriously, Gary is right about the 1/4" or so, I think I wedged mine about 3/8", and I had the; /html/spridgets/1999-07/msg00102.html (8,687 bytes)
4. Re: Rubber Bump Stop Patent #55 (score: 1): Author: "Mike Gigante" <mikeg@vicnet.net.au>; Date: Sat, 3 Jul 1999 12:45:59 +1000; Well I was actually waiting for someone to ask, but as Gary pointed out, it really is important. Rather than Gary's suggestion of simply cutting a chunk off the bump stop,I modified mine to be shaped; /html/spridgets/1999-07/msg00106.html (10,128 bytes)
5. Re: Rubber Bump Stop Patent #55 (score: 1): Author: "Mike Gigante" <mikeg@vicnet.net.au>; Date: Sat, 3 Jul 1999 12:47:58 +1000; The wedge is only useful for 1/4 elliptic cars, 1/2 elliptic cars use a rectangular block with a hole for the spring pinch bolt. The procedure was described in my earlier mail - Wedge fits under the; /html/spridgets/1999-07/msg00107.html (10,736 bytes)
6. Re: Rubber Bump Stop Patent #55 (score: 1): Author: "Robert Duquette" <RobertDuquette@Sympatico.ca>; Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 23:19:04 -0400; Really? Freudian slip ? be; /html/spridgets/1999-07/msg00111.html (10,705 bytes)
7. Re: Rubber Bump Stop Patent #55 (score: 1): Author: "Doug Ingram" <dougi@home.com>; Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 21:19:24 -0700; I absolutely have to get one of these "very sharp kitchen wife" things, as long as they can cook as well as they cut!!! ;) Doug Ingram]; /html/spridgets/1999-07/msg00113.html (7,921 bytes)
8. Re: Rubber Bump Stop Patent #55 (score: 1): Author: "Mike Gigante" <mikeg@vicnet.net.au>; Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 10:38:36 +1000; OK guys and gals. enough of the smart remarks While it is true that my dearest can sometimes have a sharp tongue, what I actually meant was a very sharp kitchen KNIFE! Lucky she hasn't seen the mail; /html/spridgets/1999-07/msg00163.html (8,280 bytes)
9. Re: Rubber Bump Stop Patent #55 (score: 1): Author: Richard D Arnold <richard.arnold@juno.com>; Date: Sun, 4 Jul 1999 23:53:49 -0500; I dunno, Mike -- rumor has it that you've been known to claim that your next wife will be normal..... Rich Council Bluffs, Iowa '74.5 RB MGB "Miss Maggie" '78 Chevy Half-Ton "Waltzin' Matilda" (LBC; /html/spridgets/1999-07/msg00189.html (8,273 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]