Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rubber\s+Bumpers\s+MGs\s+and\s+the\s+complainers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rubber\s+Bumpers\s+MGs\s+and\s+the\s+complainers\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Rubber Bumpers MGs and the complainers (score: 1): Author: ken.roach@sk.sympatico.ca (Ken Roach); Date: Thu, 01 Jan 1998 07:09:03 GMT; then=20 Well....I haven't priced out used crossmembers lately but the sway bar kit costs around 100 pounds (about $250.00 Canadian, not sure in US$). Dollar for dollar I would chose chrome any time a; /html/mgs/1998-01/msg00000.html (7,423 bytes)
2. Re: Rubber Bumpers MGs and the complainers (score: 1): Author: Mike Hartwig <mhartwig@cbu.edu>; Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 09:33:14 -0600; it was a gift. snip evry bit as >good as the older ones if you do a little work to them and they cost a lot less simply >because of attitudes like this.You can get a good rubber B for a couple of tho; /html/mgs/1997-12/msg02046.html (10,827 bytes)
3. Re: Rubber Bumpers MGs and the complainers (score: 1): Author: Benjamin Ruset <bruset@monmouth.com>; Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 10:33:43 -0500; then That's an option though. Lowering the car via springs should better handling. How are they "better" - lets consider that many chrome models are either: 1) rusted to oblivion, and therefore inex; /html/mgs/1997-12/msg02047.html (9,317 bytes)
4. Re: Rubber Bumpers MGs and the complainers (score: 1): Author: Mike Hartwig <mhartwig@cbu.edu>; Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 13:56:42 -0600; Well, maybe where you're from, chrome bumper B's are rarer, but it just takes some patience to find one either in Atlanta or Memphis. Your $800 rubber bumper B or any B for instance will usually take; /html/mgs/1997-12/msg02061.html (9,107 bytes)
5. Re: Rubber Bumpers MGs and the complainers (score: 1): Author: "Darby" <darby@tri-lakes.net>; Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 14:35:40 -0600; Jay Mike, and others: -- Major snip snip The MGA happened under the stewardship of BMC (British Motor Corp.). BL didn't come on the scene until 1968. As a noviate member of the Bill Easton Club of Se; /html/mgs/1997-12/msg02067.html (8,137 bytes)
6. Re: Rubber Bumpers MGs and the complainers (score: 1): Author: Trevor Boicey <tboicey@brit.ca>; Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 16:19:44 -0500; You have to figure taste into this equation. Otherwise, by those metrics, ALL of our Bs are fit only for the scrap heap. I can find a dozen cars you wouldn't spit on that have more power, lower ride; /html/mgs/1997-12/msg02068.html (7,880 bytes)
7. Re: Rubber Bumpers MGs and the complainers (score: 1): Author: Bob MGT <BobMGT@aol.com>; Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 16:48:22 EST; I prefer the chrome bumpers myself, but I must say that MG made the best looking government mandated 5 mph bumpers ever. MG did the best they could when the US government made good styling illegal in; /html/mgs/1997-12/msg02070.html (7,417 bytes)
8. Re: Rubber Bumpers MGs and the complainers (score: 1): Author: dmeadow@juno.com; Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 15:59:28 -0600; Oops, David is repeating my grievous error. It is the Bill EastMAN (not EasTON) Club of Self Congratulatory MGA Owners (BECSCMGAO). Hopefully Great Guru Bill (that is what we call our spiritual leade; /html/mgs/1997-12/msg02075.html (7,729 bytes)
9. Re: Rubber Bumpers MGs and the complainers (score: 1): Author: "Darby" <darby@tri-lakes.net>; Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 17:23:56 -0600; Yipes!! Eastman, Eastman. Sorry, Bill. I hope this doesn't set my novitiate status back. I am going to prostrate myself right now and say nine Hail Cecils. David --; /html/mgs/1997-12/msg02076.html (8,459 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]