Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rules\/wankel\s+engine\s+size\s+factor\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rules\/wankel\s+engine\s+size\s+factor\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\s*$/: 25 ]

Total 25 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Rules/wankel engine size factor......... (score: 1): Author: Joe Amo <jkamo@rapidnet.com>; Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2001 06:42:21 -0700; Dan, David others, I truly am waiting to see how this resolves, with the hope that the rules committee present a much more thorough representation based on emperical engineering principle. This dialo; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00256.html (14,910 bytes)
22. Rules/wankel engine size factor......... (score: 1): Author: john robinson <john@engr.wisc.edu>; Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2001 08:14:01 -0600; Heynow !! I've been chasing my own records for some time now, and I happen to be my own worst competitor......; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00258.html (8,532 bytes)
23. Re: Rules/wankel engine size factor......... (score: 1): Author: Nt788@aol.com; Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 23:27:03 EST; Rich, you will get some great answers to that one I'll bet! Jack; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00342.html (7,962 bytes)
24. Re: Rules/wankel engine size factor......... (score: 1): Author: Nt788@aol.com; Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 23:41:20 EST; Separate rotary class sound good ugh!; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00344.html (7,775 bytes)
25. Re: Rules/wankel engine size factor......... (score: 1): Author: "The Backus's" <34ford@email.msn.com>; Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 00:56:52 -0500; Dave, I think, speaking for myself, many are not that familiar with the rotary. I believe the powers to be with the SCTA should consider your questions and come up with answers and a fair ruling base; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00350.html (12,519 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 25
Page: [1] [2]