Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rules\s+for\s+Tech\s+Inspection\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rules\s+for\s+Tech\s+Inspection\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. Rules for Tech Inspection (score: 1): Author: "Jerry Mouton" <jerry@moutons.org>; Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 09:38:19 -0700; Ever wondered what has to be checked at tech? I just added this rule and the Helmet rule to the Misc rules on the car classification web site. Please read this and make sure that 1. Your car conforms; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00153.html (8,127 bytes)
2. Re: Rules for Tech Inspection (score: 1): Author: Craig Boyle <craig_boyle@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 10:39:16 -0700 (PDT); Well, is your point that we don't check most of this stuff? Or is that the rulebook should be rewritten to reflect reality? If we did this level of tech it would take forever. What SFR does isn't clo; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00156.html (13,076 bytes)
3. Re: Rules for Tech Inspection (score: 1): Author: Kenneth Allan Mitchell <nokones@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 17:27:38 -0700; All mandatory rules will be strictly enforced. We do not have any option. The safety tech inspection as described in section 3.3 is a mandatory SCCA rule. What you see that doesn't get checked at the; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00195.html (14,032 bytes)
4. Re: Rules for Tech Inspection (score: 1): Author: Scot Zediker <mx5_1991@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 17:55:39 -0700 (PDT); -- Kenneth Allan Mitchell <nokones@ix.netcom.com> Leaky beer kegs? Do those make you faster? ;) I had this done at the Castle divisional; I was running street tires on American Racing rims. And the g; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00203.html (8,655 bytes)
5. Re: Rules for Tech Inspection (score: 1): Author: Kenneth Allan Mitchell <nokones@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 17:59:22 -0700; It depends on the brand of beer. I would think that any lite beer would be faster in this case. Kevin Mc Cormick and his staff do an excellent job at Tech. You will have the pleasure of receiving his; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00205.html (9,089 bytes)
6. Re: Rules for Tech Inspection (score: 1): Author: Jim Ochi <jochi@liquidaudio.com>; Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 22:10:43 -0700; I remember Kevin McCormick checking thread engagement on my wheels at both the 98 and 99 divisionals. Mine were a hair short, but luckily after Rex Tener and Kevin discussed it, I was allowed to run.; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00215.html (9,285 bytes)
7. Re: Rules for Tech Inspection (score: 1): Author: Scot Zediker <mx5_1991@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 06:12:24 -0700 (PDT); -- Kenneth Allan Mitchell <nokones@ix.netcom.com> This year the lugnut check probably won't be an issue, now that I'm running OEM alloys on my Miata. And if Kevin doesn't know where the battery is in; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00221.html (8,113 bytes)
8. Re: Rules for Tech Inspection (score: 1): Author: Scot Zediker <mx5_1991@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 06:16:45 -0700 (PDT); <snip> I've heard about that. But it looks like I'll be missing the Duel yet again, since my car will be under the knife at that time. == Scot Zediker mx5_1991@yahoo.com San Jose, CA "Artificial inte; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00222.html (8,193 bytes)
9. Re: Rules for Tech Inspection (score: 1): Author: "Jerry Mouton" <jerry@moutons.org>; Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 07:13:24 -0700; Well, I guess my point has been well taken! All I did was to publish the official rules. You have done an excellent analysis of how badly we suck in carrying them out. I know I sure would not want t; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00225.html (16,065 bytes)
10. RE: Rules for Tech Inspection (score: 1): Author: Kevin McCormick <ktm@unify.com>; Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 07:51:37 -0700; Remember though, if ya run wheel spacers with capped lug nuts, we'll have an X-wrench for ya :-) Miata's have batteries??? Geez, _now_ someone tells me. Next thing you'll tell me is that the Integra; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00226.html (9,053 bytes)
11. RE: Rules for Tech Inspection (score: 1): Author: Scot Zediker <mx5_1991@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 08:00:50 -0700 (PDT); No wheel spacers here! I guess I'm in the clear on this one (and yes, my car WILL be out of the body shop in time for the Divisional). Um, yeah, they do have batteries. And I'm sorry to say, but your; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00227.html (8,255 bytes)
12. Re: Rules for Tech Inspection (score: 1): Author: John Kelly <76067.1750@compuserve.com>; Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 13:00:43 -0400; Message text written by Jim Ochi "But, if you want to talk about tough tech inspections, go through the tech line at Duel at DeAnza! Those tech guys are truly dedicated - the most thorough tech I've; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00230.html (8,196 bytes)
13. Re: Rules for Tech Inspection (score: 1): Author: Craig Boyle <craig_boyle@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 10:22:09 -0700 (PDT); Well, I guess *both* our cars will be dismantled one nut and bolt at a time at the next SFR tech inspection. == message truncated ==; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00231.html (15,713 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]