Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*S2000\s+classing\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*S2000\s+classing\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. S2000 Classing (score: 1): Author: Thomas Harrington <tomh@lvcm.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 13:21:28 -0800; I'm sure I just missed the news, but has the S200 been classed yet? -Tom; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00618.html (6,119 bytes)
2. Re: S2000 Classing (score: 1): Author: "Burns, James B." <BurnsJB1@central.SSD.JHUAPL.edu>; Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 10:05:36 -0500; Someone posted the stats on the S2000, so I'll compare them to the MR2T which is considered by some to be the baseline AS car. MR2T has 200hp @ 6000rpm, plus has turbo lag to deal with. MR2T has 200; /html/autox/1999-01/msg00484.html (8,239 bytes)
3. Re: S2000 Classing (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 07:14:01 -0800; You make 2 points: You type a page of comparisons and then state, "The S2000 sounds like an AS car to me. A 2 liter, naturally aspirated, 4-cyl roadster that weighs 2700 lbs. just doesn't sound like; /html/autox/1999-01/msg00485.html (8,684 bytes)
4. RE: S2000 Classing (score: 1): Author: "Burns, James B." <BurnsJB1@central.SSD.JHUAPL.edu>; Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 10:34:47 -0500; My gut feeling would be to initially put it into SS. In the current AS we have several cars which can be competitive, such as the MR2T, 968, 911, 944S2, Boxster, M3, Z3 Coupe (and maybe Roadster), a; /html/autox/1999-01/msg00487.html (7,911 bytes)
5. Re: S2000 Classing (score: 1): Author: TeamZ3@aol.com; Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 12:54:51 EST; IMO the BMW 2.8 Z3 roadster can be just as competitive as the 2.8 coupe; They have the same suspension, drivetrain, and general specs, and all '99 Z-series vehicles get the Torsen LSD (originally loo; /html/autox/1999-01/msg00498.html (7,501 bytes)
6. Re: S2000 Classing (score: 1): Author: Matt Murray <mattm@nassau.cv.net>; Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 17:43:54 -0500; So THAT explains the purchase. <VBG> :-) -- Matt Murray mailto:mattm@nassau.cv.net mailto:mdmurray@gwns.com; /html/autox/1999-01/msg00516.html (7,041 bytes)
7. Re: S2000 classing (score: 1): Author: "Racer---X" <Racer---X@email.msn.com>; Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 22:17:07 -0500; cars Absolutely not true! If it were so, I'd be driving an Edsel instead of a Miata. Michael Karp (Where is the Edsel classed anyway.............); /html/autox/1999-01/msg00585.html (7,068 bytes)
8. Re: S2000 classing (score: 1): Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <eric10mm@qni.com>; Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 23:07:22 -0800; -- FS, of course. ;^) Just ask the Nebraska region. See you on course. Eric Linnhoff in KC '98 Neon R/T <eric10mm@qni.com> Running my rig around ninety-five Rockin' and rollin' in overdrive My heart; /html/autox/1999-01/msg00590.html (7,564 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]