Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SB\s+42\s+on\s+Appropriations\s+Committee\s+Suspense\s+list\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SB\s+42\s+on\s+Appropriations\s+Committee\s+Suspense\s+list\?\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. SB 42 on Appropriations Committee Suspense list? (score: 1): Author: PHILIPPE TUSLER <TUSLER@mp050.mv.unisys.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Jul 1997 11:52:42 -0700 (PDT) (11:52 am 18:52 UT); So what does it mean that the California SB 42 was placed on the Appropriations committee suspense list? It's waiting their action? It's suspended and dead? There was an analysis of the bill's impact; /html/mgs/1997-07/msg01093.html (9,115 bytes)
2. Re: SB 42 on Appropriations Committee Suspense list? (score: 1): Author: BDurgin1@aol.com; Date: Thu, 17 Jul 1997 18:40:10 -0400 (EDT); This latest thread does not sound good at all. Anyone have more info on the next step? P.S ......I called the Apprpriations Subcommittee and registered my vote ..they are very pleasant...just asked w; /html/mgs/1997-07/msg01110.html (8,808 bytes)
3. Re: SB 42 on Appropriations Committee Suspense list? (score: 1): Author: TATERRY@aol.com; Date: Thu, 17 Jul 1997 19:41:59 -0400 (EDT); << So what does it mean that the California SB 42 was placed on the Appropriations committee suspense list? It's waiting their action? It's suspended and dead? I'm told by my companies political cons; /html/mgs/1997-07/msg01111.html (8,359 bytes)
4. Re: SB 42 on Appropriations Committee Suspense list? (score: 1): Author: The Richards <smrm@coastalnet.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Jul 1997 22:16:41 -0500; I'm not a Californian (though I lived there for a bit), but I was wondering if anyone had ever considered a HUGE ralley in the state's capital? Not just LBCs, but all classic cars of various persuasi; /html/mgs/1997-07/msg01116.html (8,237 bytes)
5. Re: SB 42 on Appropriations Committee Suspense list? (score: 1): Author: pbailey <pbailey@qnet.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Jul 1997 21:10:06 -0700; I don't know what it means either but the so-called impact sounds like a lot of B@#LS*^T to me just how many 25 year old cars do you see on the road?Not many this so called tons of pollution and cost; /html/mgs/1997-07/msg01117.html (8,139 bytes)
6. Re: SB 42 on Appropriations Committee Suspense list? (score: 1): Author: drded@ix.netcom.com (David Deutsch); Date: Fri, 18 Jul 1997 07:08:41 -0500 (CDT); wondering Not just .just up, I'm not a Califorian either (and I never played one on TV) but I think that a mass assembly of cars is counter-productive. I don't know the answer but feel that if we don; /html/mgs/1997-07/msg01119.html (9,192 bytes)
7. Re: SB 42 on Appropriations Committee Suspense list? (score: 1): Author: "William L. Singleton" <singleton@ccsu.edu>; Date: Fri, 18 Jul 1997 08:33:06 -0400; I believe that this has been suggested before, but wouldn't iot help to get a list of states that have passed similar measures? Connecticut just did and, as a short-time resident of this state, I can; /html/mgs/1997-07/msg01121.html (9,989 bytes)
8. Re: SB 42 on Appropriations Committee Suspense list? (score: 1): Author: The Richards <smrm@coastalnet.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Jul 1997 08:30:02 -0500; I beg to differ, and any number of 'grassroots' movements can be illustrative. Of course, you wouldn't want to tie up traffic and block entrances to public buildings! Just a gathering spread through; /html/mgs/1997-07/msg01122.html (9,748 bytes)
9. Re: SB 42 on Appropriations Committee Suspense list? (score: 1): Author: mil76@juno.com; Date: Fri, 18 Jul 1997 10:43:01 EDT; I've been off the list for a few months now, so forgive me if I am simply rehashing ideas already expressed. If the object is to convince the lawmakers that our lbc's are not the smog belching gorill; /html/mgs/1997-07/msg01126.html (8,644 bytes)
10. Re: SB 42 on Appropriations Committee Suspense list? (score: 1): Author: Gary Burrell <garyb@pentek.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Jul 1997 11:09:15 -0400; .... Why not suggest that only cars with "Classic" plates be exempted, and that the requirements for classic plates would be something like: 1) Not primary auto 2) 25 + years old (or some other # 20?; /html/mgs/1997-07/msg01127.html (9,203 bytes)
11. Re: SB 42 on Appropriations Committee Suspense list? (score: 1): Author: Ryan Watson <rswatson@nyx.nyx.net>; Date: Fri, 18 Jul 1997 09:17:10 -0600 (MDT); I don't know if I like that plan, since my MG is my primary (only) auto, but is driven about once a week. I wouldn't want to have to buy another car just so my B could be my "secondary" auto. How do; /html/mgs/1997-07/msg01128.html (9,029 bytes)
12. Re: SB 42 on Appropriations Committee Suspense list? (score: 1): Author: Spook37211@aol.com; Date: Sat, 19 Jul 1997 10:00:43 -0400 (EDT); I 'm not sure that this is really about pollution; after all, when a cor is produced new, more pollution is released by a factor of 5 than the car can produce over a life time of 250,000 miles. It h; /html/mgs/1997-07/msg01175.html (8,311 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]