- 1. Re: SCCA (was Woohoo!!) (score: 1)
- Author: "John Viviani" <geeno@adelphia.net>
- Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 15:35:54 -0500
- I don't want to upset anyone and the numbers you are showing are great. However for the last five years (Keep in mind 1st year IL, 2-3 Central Kansas, now in VA just south of Summit Point) I have bee
- /html/shop-talk/2001-12/msg00153.html (9,012 bytes)
- 2. Re: SCCA (was Woohoo!!) (score: 1)
- Author: "Rex Burkheimer - WM" <rex@txol.net>
- Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 15:00:57 -0600
- Unfortunately those stories are common, even here in my own region. All I can say is all of us are volunteers, with jobs, family, lives etc. And racing is pretty intense - when you aren't at the tra
- /html/shop-talk/2001-12/msg00154.html (11,840 bytes)
- 3. Re: SCCA (was Woohoo!!) (score: 1)
- Author: David Hillman <hillman@planet-torque.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 16:33:55 -0500 (EST)
- I'm near Chicago, and also willing to help anyone get started, if I can. I've autocrossed, rallycrossed, and ice raced a bunch of cars, and will probably be serving on a committee of "new driver liai
- /html/shop-talk/2001-12/msg00155.html (7,781 bytes)
- 4. Re: SCCA (was Woohoo!!) (score: 1)
- Author: Rush <jdrush@enter.net>
- Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 19:08:54 -0500
- I'm sorry you had such a tough time with the SCCA unfortunately we are often only as good as your local region. That is why one of the big SCCA initiatives is a training program for out regional lead
- /html/shop-talk/2001-12/msg00157.html (8,316 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu