Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SCCA\s+national\s+office\s+move\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SCCA\s+national\s+office\s+move\s*$/: 49 ]

Total 49 documents matching your query.

1. Re: SCCA national office move (score: 1): Author: bthatch@juno.com; Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 12:35:14 -0400; I contacted my area Director and already got a reply on this issue. Whereas I understand why you would like the national office in your neighborhood, in Kansas, I have to disagree with your reasonin; /html/autox/2001-08/msg00200.html (10,841 bytes)
2. Re: SCCA national office move (score: 1): Author: Rex Tener <rex_tener@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 09:58:07 -0700; Ben, you have to be joking! Birmingham in the center??? Yahoo maps shows it being 2300 miles to Birmhingham, 1852 miles to Topeka, and 1785 miles to Dallas from the heart of the San Francisco region.; /html/autox/2001-08/msg00203.html (8,420 bytes)
3. RE: SCCA national office move (score: 1): Author: "Marc Dencker [MS]" <marcdencker@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 11:16:44 -0700; all-weather airport and is only 2 hrs. from Atlanta airport which is the busiest in the world with great connections anywhere. My car doesn't travel by plane. Cheers, Marc PM NetXP Network Connectio; /html/autox/2001-08/msg00204.html (12,008 bytes)
4. Re: SCCA national office move (score: 1): Author: "Rick Cone" <rickcone@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 14:17:39 -0400; I am afraid Rex, it may be you joking, statistically anyway. According to the most recent US Census... http://www.census.gov/geo/www/cenpop/cntpop2k.html The median center of population in the US is.; /html/autox/2001-08/msg00205.html (10,981 bytes)
5. Re: SCCA national office move (score: 1): Author: Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 14:40:07 -0400; FWIW, New England is the second or third largest region. They are east of Metro NYC. I seem to remember San Fran is the largest. Personally, I'm 47.9 to the Metropolitan Museum of Art. For total New; /html/autox/2001-08/msg00208.html (9,277 bytes)
6. Re: SCCA national office move (score: 1): Author: Kevin Stevens <Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 11:42:30 -0700 (PDT); It's better form to put your assumptions at the beginning of your argument rather than the end. Basing the location near the population center (of SCCA membership, which may not be the same thing as; /html/autox/2001-08/msg00209.html (10,685 bytes)
7. Re: SCCA national office move (score: 1): Author: bthatch@juno.com; Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 14:46:21 -0400; Neither is Denver in the center of the nation. My point is, that most people don't realize how close to the center Alabama really is. Your mileage numbers are from the Bay area, so a good deal of th; /html/autox/2001-08/msg00210.html (9,205 bytes)
8. Re: SCCA national office move (score: 1): Author: bthatch@juno.com; Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 14:53:06 -0400; Rick, Rick, stirring the pot again, are you? I hope you don't plan to run any events on the West Coast anytime soon <grin>. Of course, next we'll hear how San Francisco region nails down the highest; /html/autox/2001-08/msg00211.html (10,781 bytes)
9. Re: SCCA national office move (score: 1): Author: CHARLES SCHULTZ <n2pua4@peoplepc.com>; Date: 16 Aug 2001 12:11:20 -0700; Even though it would be fun to have it really close by (I live less than an hour from Birmingham,) I think it's really more practical farther west. Remember, the upcoming vote is _only_ on where the; /html/autox/2001-08/msg00213.html (9,528 bytes)
10. RE: SCCA national office move (score: 1): Author: James Gunn-Wilkinson <jgunn@genoptix.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 12:23:42 -0700; The question of membership stats is one for the home office. My guess would be (based on attendance size at tour events) that the West has more active members. Take a look at the San Diego tour. At n; /html/autox/2001-08/msg00214.html (12,495 bytes)
11. Re: SCCA national office move (score: 1): Author: Kevin Stevens <Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 12:30:56 -0700 (PDT); Road racers are, by necessity, more severely constrained on available sites. They are also, by the nature of the sport, dealing with higher income brackets, which in turn are usually associated with; /html/autox/2001-08/msg00215.html (13,006 bytes)
12. RE: SCCA national office move (score: 1): Author: "Paula Whitney" <pwhitney@shamroc.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 14:39:42 -0500; The highest attended events each year are the ones held in the Central Division. Peru Tour would have 400 entrants if we did not put a cap on the event. paula whitney The question of membership stats; /html/autox/2001-08/msg00216.html (13,378 bytes)
13. Re: SCCA national office move (score: 1): Author: "Pat Kelly" <lollipop487@home.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 12:35:33 -0700; Road racing doesn't seem to mind I think something's slipped your mind. The national road racing runoffs attract drivers from across the country because there's a travel fund that is portioned out to; /html/autox/2001-08/msg00217.html (12,109 bytes)
14. Re: SCCA national office move (score: 1): Author: "Rick Cone" <rickcone@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 16:03:08 -0400; Using your logic, If one year its in San Fran, then the next it should be in Washington DC. Not very practical to stick it on the coasts. Perhaps a Wendover/Birmingham rotation. But then the NEDIV wi; /html/autox/2001-08/msg00220.html (14,263 bytes)
15. Re: SCCA national office move (score: 1): Author: "Rick Cone" <rickcone@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 16:05:35 -0400; It's also better form to put your replies at the beginning of a thread versus the end. :) I would disagree whole heartedly, and fair is relative to he/she that thinks is getting the short end of the; /html/autox/2001-08/msg00221.html (13,731 bytes)
16. RE: SCCA national office move (score: 1): Author: "Richard Atkins" <richarda@npclabels.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 16:05:54 -0500; NOBODY is talking about moving the runoffs or Solo 2 Nationals. The question is should the NATIONAL OFFICE be moved. I have yet to go to the national office and I for one don't care where they put it; /html/autox/2001-08/msg00222.html (9,217 bytes)
17. Re: SCCA national office move (score: 1): Author: "Rick Cone" <rickcone@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 16:08:11 -0400; thing But what do we gain if we do? If it did move and we had 3000 people show up would it be a positive move? would likely thing /// autox@autox.team.net mailing list /// /// To unsubscribe send a; /html/autox/2001-08/msg00223.html (13,211 bytes)
18. RE: SCCA national office move (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 16:28:36 -0400 (EDT); Hey, that's pretty close to Evansville / Birmingham / the center of the US population! Lets have nationals there! Mark (btw, I don't really see how having nationals in the population center is "unfa; /html/autox/2001-08/msg00224.html (9,637 bytes)
19. RE: SCCA national office move (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 16:33:31 -0400; James Gunn-Wilkinson <jgunn@genoptix.com> would active Uhh... I'll take that bet. San Diego Tour: 297 drivers Peru Tour: 350 drivers (capped artificially) If time and space permitted, I bet the Peru; /html/autox/2001-08/msg00225.html (10,093 bytes)
20. Re: SCCA national office move (score: 1): Author: "Rick Cone" <rickcone@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 16:36:45 -0400; I KNOW we are not talking about moving Nationals NOW. There is a undercurrent though, to have nationals close to the home office or vice versa. That's what we are discussing. the be of /// autox@auto; /html/autox/2001-08/msg00226.html (10,020 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]