Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SCCA\s+runoffs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SCCA\s+runoffs\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. SCCA runoffs (score: 1): Author: matt matthews <mattspit@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 17:18:54 -0500; What happened to Sargus? Why did he not finish?; /html/fot/2003-10/msg00055.html (6,365 bytes)
2. Re: SCCA runoffs (score: 1): Author: Ted Schumacher <tedtsimx@bright.net>; Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 20:09:03 -0400; He lost a valve. Ted -- Ted Schumacher <tedtsimx@bright.net> TS Imported Automotive 108 S. Jefferson St. Pandora, Ohio, USA 45877 Ph. 800/543-6648 USA/Canada FAX 419/384-3272 24 hour Ph. 419/384-3022; /html/fot/2003-10/msg00056.html (6,776 bytes)
3. Re: SCCA runoffs (score: 1): Author: "Aaron Johnson" <fpspitfire37@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 21:08:24 -0700; lump failure...to what extent I don't know. Sargis has been putting out HUGE power with the 1296 since his switch to FP, but reliability has been a problem at the big show. I believe he ran trouble f; /html/fot/2003-10/msg00057.html (7,129 bytes)
4. SCCA runoffs (score: 1): Author: "Mike Munson" <fasttrs@mindspring.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 13:40:46 -0400; Check out the live timing feature on the www.scca.org <http://www.scca.org/> for the runoffs. Pretty cool because you can watch the times as the drivers hit the timer. Sam Halkias will be qualifying; /html/fot/2003-09/msg00199.html (7,076 bytes)
5. RE: SCCA runoffs (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 11:10:15 -0700; Very cool--I got to "watch" my friend Cindi Lux and her teammate Scotty White qualify their cars. I've got to do the runoffs some year. I'll probably have to move from a Radical to a Storh though. Am; /html/fot/2003-09/msg00200.html (7,458 bytes)
6. RE: SCCA runoffs (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 11:15:41 -0700; Take a look at the times for the DSR cars compared to everything else. These little cars are getting awfully fast for 1000cc Sports Racers. Even most of the CSRs are slower. They're seven seconds a l; /html/fot/2003-09/msg00201.html (7,540 bytes)
7. Re: SCCA runoffs (score: 1): Author: "kas kastner" <kaskas@cox.net>; Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 13:39:38 -0700; Thanks for the info on the runoffs Mike. Just watched Steve Sargis smoke everyone for the pole by over a second. Tough Spitfire and driver. -- Original Message -- From: "Mike Munson" <fasttrs@mindspr; /html/fot/2003-09/msg00205.html (7,680 bytes)
8. RE: SCCA runoffs (score: 1): Author: "Doug Mitchell" <dmitchel@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 17:09:15 -0400; I was watching this most of the day at work. Hard to get going on some of my projects while following the qualifying. It'll be even worse tomorrow. Doug Amici, Check out the live timing feature on th; /html/fot/2003-09/msg00209.html (7,545 bytes)
9. RE: SCCA runoffs (score: 1): Author: Dave Riddle <dave@microworks.net>; Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 00:05:17 -0700; Maybe so, but the really amazing stat (and development) is the cars in my open-wheel class - F500 (http://www.f500.org). In a mixed field of DSR and F500 our top five qualifiers would be in grid posi; /html/fot/2003-09/msg00216.html (8,845 bytes)
10. RE: SCCA runoffs (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 00:34:13 -0700; I like the F500s though I'm way too big for them and my wife is allergic to open wheel cars. But there's a huge difference between 1st and 13th. In a lot of club races the person in first laps all th; /html/fot/2003-09/msg00217.html (9,694 bytes)
11. SCCA Runoffs (score: 1): Author: R John Lye <rjl6n@uva.pcmail.virginia.edu>; Date: Wed, 15 Oct 97 09:17:06 EDT; Well now that I've had a couple of days to think about it all, here's my report on the Runoffs. First, it was great to finally meet Hardy and Ellie Prentice; they are really delightful folks. It was; /html/fot/1997-10/msg00017.html (8,631 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]