Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SFR\s+rule\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SFR\s+rule\s*$/: 54 ]

Total 54 documents matching your query.

1. Re: SFR rule (score: 1): Author: "Jerry Mouton" <jerry@moutons.org>; Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 07:37:34 -0800; Not exactly not good form to ride along, but not good form to abuse the system so that your competitors begin to feel that you are getting a big advantage by doing so "excessively". Obviously this d; /html/ba-autox/2001-11/msg00341.html (8,472 bytes)
2. Re: SFR rule (score: 1): Author: James Creasy <black94pgt@pacbell.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 09:02:27 -0800; either its a rule or it is not. what is the written text of the rule? unless it is a officially protestable offense, i dont see how irritating your competitors has anything to do with it. (although; /html/ba-autox/2001-11/msg00346.html (9,485 bytes)
3. Re: SFR rule (score: 1): Author: Toy4speed@aol.com; Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 12:09:41 EST; This must be one of those "unwritten codes of ethics" like not stealing second base when your team is up 7 runs in the 8th inning. (asking for a beanball !). I was once concerned about catching rides; /html/ba-autox/2001-11/msg00348.html (8,003 bytes)
4. Re: SFR rule (score: 1): Author: "Jerry Mouton" <jerry@moutons.org>; Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 09:19:27 -0800; You're thinking steady state. At one time there was no rule, and this time may come again with abuse. The rule is at http://www.sfrscca.org/solo2/Results/2001/supps.html, number 15. It's not protest; /html/ba-autox/2001-11/msg00351.html (11,157 bytes)
5. Re: SFR rule (score: 1): Author: Kevin Stevens <Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 09:31:30 -0800 (PST); The text of the rule isn't controversial, the existence of the rule is. But it hasn't been a problem very much or very often, and it has certainly paid great dividends in instructor availability. I'm; /html/ba-autox/2001-11/msg00354.html (10,996 bytes)
6. Re: SFR rule (score: 1): Author: James Creasy <black94pgt@pacbell.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 10:30:03 -0800; it seems really weird to have a rule that specifically states something is legal, but also have this whispered undercurrent that you cant follow the clearly written rule. what other unwritten rules a; /html/ba-autox/2001-11/msg00363.html (12,625 bytes)
7. Re: SFR rule (score: 1): Author: Vernon Head <vhead@radar.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 11:01:12 -0800; I think that this problem solves itself as drivers work their way up the ladder towards Nationals. Most veteran drivers don't want to become too dependent upon this "look" at the course because they; /html/ba-autox/2001-11/msg00364.html (8,481 bytes)
8. Re: SFR rule (score: 1): Author: "Jerry Mouton" <jerry@moutons.org>; Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 11:07:59 -0800; You want to suggest a wording that would make the rule explicit? We spent many hour haggling this back and forth, and many on the SC were at that time, probably are still today opposed to allowing p; /html/ba-autox/2001-11/msg00365.html (14,761 bytes)
9. Re: SFR rule (score: 1): Author: craig boyle <craig_autox@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 11:41:35 -0800 (PST); .. another unwritten rule: It's OK to jump to the front of the line with hot tires if you get a rerun. http://www.sfrscca.org/solo2/Results/2001/supps.html,; /html/ba-autox/2001-11/msg00366.html (14,170 bytes)
10. Re: SFR rule (score: 1): Author: James Creasy <black94pgt@pacbell.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 12:16:37 -0800; hi jerry, yes, and it would be exactly the wording used for the current rule. :) ah, i dont care about this that much... but it might be off putting for a novice to discover that there are these 'sec; /html/ba-autox/2001-11/msg00367.html (16,581 bytes)
11. Re: SFR rule (score: 1): Author: "John F. Kelly Jr." <76067.1750@compuserve.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 15:54:23 -0500; Message text written by James Creasy "i was even advised by a veteran autocrosser to make use of that rulespecifically to gain an advantage. -james OSP #74" -- End Original Message -- I think you sho; /html/ba-autox/2001-11/msg00368.html (8,812 bytes)
12. RE: SFR rule (score: 1): Author: "Navid Kahangi" <navid@interwoven.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 13:22:59 -0800; Not to nitpick, but an advantage is only unfair if the others have no way of obtaining it. Not so in this case. --Navid; /html/ba-autox/2001-11/msg00371.html (9,672 bytes)
13. RE: SFR rule (score: 1): Author: "Scott Loughmiller" <scott@radiate.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 13:35:20 -0800; In defense of the rule, as a new competitor this year, the biggest improvements to my driving have come after riding with people in my class, or having them ride with me. The "Oh . . . that's how you; /html/ba-autox/2001-11/msg00373.html (10,337 bytes)
14. Re: SFR rule (score: 1): Author: "Pat Kelly" <lollipop487@home.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 13:31:53 -0800; But true in other cases? --; /html/ba-autox/2001-11/msg00374.html (10,102 bytes)
15. Re: SFR rule (score: 1): Author: "Jerry Mouton" <jerry@moutons.org>; Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 13:51:58 -0800; And now you begin to see the mechanism by which this rule will go away if there is abuse. Jerry Jerry Mouton mailto:jerry@moutons.org Laissez les bons temps rouler! -- Original Message -- From: "Joh; /html/ba-autox/2001-11/msg00375.html (9,677 bytes)
16. Re: SFR rule (score: 1): Author: "Jerry Mouton" <jerry@moutons.org>; Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 13:56:12 -0800; There is an advantage, and it goes to the "nice". Jerks and crabby people won't get as many opportunities to ride, nor will the non-sociable have the guts to ask for rides. This was all part of the; /html/ba-autox/2001-11/msg00377.html (10,575 bytes)
17. Re: SFR rule (score: 1): Author: "Jerry Mouton" <jerry@moutons.org>; Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 14:02:27 -0800; "Sold" as a benefit for one new driver??? Where did that come from? It was sold as a way to have more fun at our autocrosses and to bring Novices along fastest. I think probably if the SC considered; /html/ba-autox/2001-11/msg00378.html (10,108 bytes)
18. RE: SFR rule (score: 1): Author: "Kelly, Katie" <kkelly@spss.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 14:19:14 -0800; I used to be totally against the passenger rule, like it was the most offensive thing to ever happen to the sport of Solo, but then people kept reminding me that this was all supposed to be for fun,; /html/ba-autox/2001-11/msg00379.html (11,008 bytes)
19. RE: SFR rule (score: 1): Author: "Navid Kahangi" <navid@interwoven.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 15:00:48 -0800; In this case, anybody can take advantage of the rule (except for people with personality or hygiene problems of course :)). So, there is no *unfair* advantage. --Navid; /html/ba-autox/2001-11/msg00380.html (10,941 bytes)
20. RE: SFR rule (score: 1): Author: Paul S <ibisbike@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 15:10:01 -0800 (PST); I have to agree with Katie and others on this one. I'm really new to the sport this year having just run a handfull of events. I have taken advantage of having a few people ride along with me to have; /html/ba-autox/2001-11/msg00381.html (12,884 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]