Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SPAM\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SPAM\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Spam (score: 1): Author: "kas kastner" <kaskas@cox.net>; Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 08:56:30 -0800; There seems to be a list of services in Australia that have a strong SPAM program and I cannot get through with the answers to their inquiry's. Almost all the messages to Australia have been returned; /html/fot/2005-02/msg00164.html (6,366 bytes)
2. RE: Spam (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:02:47 -0800; Most spam filters don't bounce, except for challenge/response which directs you to a response site before delivering your email. Doesn't sound like that's what happened. You've probably either got th; /html/fot/2005-02/msg00165.html (7,321 bytes)
3. SPAM (score: 1): Author: "Jack W. Drews" <vinttr4@geneseo.net>; Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 08:44:24 -0800; Pardon me for taking up bandwidth on a non-car subject, but I'm sending this out because I am receiving SPAM that may have originated because of my subscription to these lists. If anyone else is expe; /html/fot/2001-12/msg00051.html (6,881 bytes)
4. Re: SPAM (score: 1): Author: WEmery7451@aol.com; Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 10:07:29 EST; << I am receiving SPAM that may have originated because of my subscription to these lists. If anyone else is experiencing this, I want you to know about the following. >> I could be wrong, but I beli; /html/fot/2001-12/msg00052.html (6,947 bytes)
5. Re: SPAM (score: 1): Author: Ted Schumacher <tedtsimx@q1.net>; Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2001 12:22:58 -0500; that's because spam can be used as a flotation device. ted -- Ted Schumacher tedtsimx@q1.net http://www.tsimportedautomotive.com Fax: 419/ 384-3272 (24 hrs.) Phone: 800/ 543-6648 (US & Canada) Tech/G; /html/fot/2001-12/msg00061.html (8,551 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]