Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SPAM\s+FILTER\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SPAM\s+FILTER\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. SPAM FILTER (score: 1): Author: "Norman C. Miller" <rootes1@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 09:55:54 -0800; For those of you interested in making sure your car has a fuel filter with the proper original appearance: http://www.classictiger.com/mudge/temp/orig-tiger-fuel%20filter-01.jpg ncm; /html/tigers/2003-03/msg00030.html (7,230 bytes)
2. Re: SPAM FILTER (score: 1): Author: stubrennan@attbi.com; Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 18:23:35 +0000; The clear/metal top type filter was on my car when I got it, but that was 1977. Unknown is whether previous owners ever changed it. Perhaps not, from the condition and overspray. Anyway, I guess this; /html/tigers/2003-03/msg00031.html (7,269 bytes)
3. Re: SPAM FILTER (score: 1): Author: CoolVT@aol.com; Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 16:03:47 EST; Now why would you say this contradicts what Steve found when you say you aren't sure if the previous owner ever changed yours? :-) I think mine looked like yours when I got it in 1989, but I assumed; /html/tigers/2003-03/msg00032.html (7,171 bytes)
4. Re: SPAM FILTER (score: 1): Author: "DrMayf" <drmayf@teknett.com>; Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 14:36:54 -0800; Hmmmm, interesting thread here. Since the motors were purchased from Ford and I suppose they were complete, then I would suspect that a Ford filter was used. But maybe not... mayf -- Original Message; /html/tigers/2003-03/msg00034.html (7,876 bytes)
5. Re: SPAM FILTER (score: 1): Author: DJoh797014@aol.com; Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 18:01:10 EST; I still have my original filter but not on the car. Its just like NCM's photo. Clear plastic with a metal top. Sorry no numbers on it. I believe one of the books that showed the actual production lin; /html/tigers/2003-03/msg00035.html (7,364 bytes)
6. Re: SPAM FILTER (score: 1): Author: Tiger Mk I <tiger_mki@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 08:40:32 -0800 (PST); I have been a "lurker" on this list, and probably will remain so. But, this posting by the respected Norman Miller has given me some incentive to make a comment. While it is fair to have a difference; /html/tigers/2003-03/msg00044.html (9,624 bytes)
7. RE: SPAM FILTER (score: 1): Author: "Tom Witt" <wittsend@jps.net>; Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 08:56:27 -0800; Could it be that: A. Tigers came with the clear/metal filter, BUT the subsequent Ford replacement filter is C2RZ-9155-A, an all metal filter? Meaning that these engines came from an industrial branch; /html/tigers/2003-03/msg00045.html (8,736 bytes)
8. Re: SPAM FILTER (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@socal.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 12:05:57 -0800; Thanks for your points on my "prose". You pose an interesting set of observations that could, and should, be evaluated. I will add the portion of information I have: 1) The "Supplement" in the parts; /html/tigers/2003-03/msg00046.html (13,625 bytes)
9. RE: SPAM FILTER (score: 1): Author: "Frank Marrone" <itswonderful@attbi.com>; Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 12:43:12 -0800; Could have been worse, FOOL FILTER would have been a good one too. Seriously, I don't see how Mr. Millers little jab can be taken as a smear. With all due respect to Mr. Laifman, I thought it was pre; /html/tigers/2003-03/msg00047.html (8,170 bytes)
10. Re: SPAM FILTER (score: 1): Author: SFordRB@aol.com; Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2003 16:29:53 EST; Points well taken and something I will keep in mind. Thanks Tom Moonstone; /html/tigers/2003-03/msg00052.html (6,954 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]