- 1. SST vs. STU (score: 1)
- Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com
- Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 09:25:55 -0400
- I got a letter from a somewhat confused SCCA Marketroid yesterday, wondering why it was I was talking about a new Super Street Touring class when STU appeared to be pretty well what I wanted. I confe
- /html/autox/1999-07/msg00059.html (11,957 bytes)
- 2. Re: SST vs. STU (score: 1)
- Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 08:05:38 -0700
- At least this is an *interesting* thread. :] I wouldn't blame those who might say they'll *scream* next time they see the word "turbo" -- but speaking for myself, I *am* gonna scream every time I see
- /html/autox/1999-07/msg00062.html (10,214 bytes)
- 3. Re: SST vs. STU (score: 1)
- Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
- Date: Fri, 02 Jul 1999 11:23:56 -0700
- [snipage] I think that if we're trying to create a national level category, then we have to toss the emissions requirement. As Dennis said, a car registered in California is going to be seriously ham
- /html/autox/1999-07/msg00066.html (9,551 bytes)
- 4. Re: SST vs. STU (score: 1)
- Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com
- Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 15:30:40 -0400
- I still worry about what that registration requires, depending on which state/country you're in. - some states don't care what you register, you could register a Formula Ford for the street if it ha
- /html/autox/1999-07/msg00070.html (9,795 bytes)
- 5. Re: SST vs. STU (score: 1)
- Author: "Jamie Sculerati" <jamies@mrj.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 15:53:00 -0500
- In fact, some do -- or "street" tires with wear characteristics nearly as poor and costing at least as much. Many of these folks are racing (really racing...) on the street, and come equipped for it.
- /html/autox/1999-07/msg00072.html (8,486 bytes)
- 6. Re: SST vs. STU (score: 1)
- Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 14:16:50 -0700
- Wulll, gotta admit that what I know about how cars are hampered by emissions these days is limited. But my own turbocar, the SVO, was identically equipped for all 50 states (CA cars simply paid more
- /html/autox/1999-07/msg00076.html (9,729 bytes)
- 7. Re: SST vs. STU (score: 1)
- Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 14:22:02 -0700
- My own comments of late (including my post excerpted for this part of the thread) have avoided this fencing over which is more expensive. I even made the point that the tires/wheels that RRs run on
- /html/autox/1999-07/msg00077.html (7,781 bytes)
- 8. Re: SST vs. STU (score: 1)
- Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 14:23:15 -0700
- guys -- So -- where *are* they? The RRs, that is. Richard Nichols rnichol1@san.rr.com 1986 Ford Mustang SVO / 1C VirtualTeamSVO Member 1972 Ford Pinto Sedan / 3J - Original Owner Displayed @ San Die
- /html/autox/1999-07/msg00078.html (7,845 bytes)
- 9. Fw: SST vs. STU (score: 1)
- Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 14:28:26 -0700
- Strategically it makes sense to me to allow ST classes to have <SNIP> The jury will please disregard the witness's statements! :] Of course I meant it does NOT make sense to me that street touring c
- /html/autox/1999-07/msg00079.html (7,515 bytes)
- 10. Re: SST vs. STU (score: 1)
- Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
- Date: Fri, 02 Jul 1999 20:14:45 -0600
- Richard, We're not talking about daily drivers here. We're talking about complete engine transplants and turbo or supercharger add-ons. How many inspector stations in California (draconian smog laws,
- /html/autox/1999-07/msg00087.html (11,035 bytes)
- 11. Re: SST vs. STU (score: 1)
- Author: washburn <washburn@dwave.net>
- Date: Mon, 05 Jul 1999 11:37:13 -0500
- If my Neon was running in STU, would I be "Beef STU"? -- Patrick Washburn <washburn@dwave.net> Wausau, WI Land of Cheese 95 DS Neon Moooooooooo.
- /html/autox/1999-07/msg00128.html (7,285 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu