Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*STS\s+Class\s+Supported\s+in\s+SFR\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*STS\s+Class\s+Supported\s+in\s+SFR\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. STS Class Supported in SFR (score: 1): Author: "Jerry Mouton" <jerry@moutons.org>; Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 22:16:40 -0800; The SCCA STS Class will be run as a SFR Regional class starting in Round 3. It will run in the same run group as Street Touring (R tires) class, which in Round 3 is run group 7. STS entrants will cou; /html/ba-autox/2000-03/msg00406.html (9,611 bytes)
2. Re: STS Class Supported in SFR (score: 1): Author: "Jerry Mouton" <jerry@moutons.org>; Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 22:55:12 -0800; STS will get two fewer drops than other classes; if we have 16 events, that will be two. If we have 15, that will mean only one drop for STS. This is the way we did it when Street Touring was introd; /html/ba-autox/2000-03/msg00407.html (7,713 bytes)
3. Re: STS Class Supported in SFR (score: 1): Author: Pat Kelly <lollipop@ricochet.net>; Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 08:14:38 -0800; On any controversy on the STS index: What Andy McKee was upset about last night was the index that Howard Duncan was using at the San Bernardino Pro, which is quite different from the one we use gen; /html/ba-autox/2000-03/msg00410.html (11,333 bytes)
4. Re: STS Class Supported in SFR (score: 1): Author: "Darren P. Madams" <darren@madams.com>; Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 08:48:33 -0800; On a related note... Can we (the karts) run King Howie's index too :) Sometimes it's good to have the dictator on your side! :) --Darren "PAX roadkill, unless I'm driving CS" Madams; /html/ba-autox/2000-03/msg00411.html (12,222 bytes)
5. Re: STS Class Supported in SFR (score: 1): Author: Pat Kelly <lollipop@ricochet.net>; Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 09:24:03 -0800; Nobody's running Howie's index at SFR events, unless you want to restructure for your own amusement. We're using the PAX index, period. Howie changes his rules too often to maintain any kind of consi; /html/ba-autox/2000-03/msg00412.html (13,261 bytes)
6. Re: STS Class Supported in SFR (score: 1): Author: Andy McKee <andrewmckee@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 11:10:16 -0800 (PST); Don't put words in my mouth so quickly, Pat. I prefer Dave's PAX numbers because they are at least based on results from SoloII events, not ProSolo. Pro's require very different PAX numbers because; /html/ba-autox/2000-03/msg00417.html (9,481 bytes)
7. Re: STS Class Supported in SFR (score: 1): Author: John Kelly <76067.1750@compuserve.com>; Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 18:25:18 -0500; Message text written by Andy McKee which to think IMHO, there is NEVER enough data upon which to base a PAX number! The differences in course design between what we see here and the other regions is; /html/ba-autox/2000-03/msg00422.html (9,376 bytes)
8. Re: STS Class Supported in SFR (score: 1): Author: Andy McKee <andrewmckee@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 15:59:26 -0800 (PST); I think you are wrong to say that our courses are similar to Topeka, while other Regions are not. In fact, one complaint I have had is that ours (generally) are not enough like Topeka to be good prep; /html/ba-autox/2000-03/msg00424.html (9,750 bytes)
9. Re: STS Class Supported in SFR (score: 1): Author: Craig Boyle <craig_boyle@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 20:10:47 -0800 (PST); Every class that isn't a spec class is a PAXed class, every car in the class is given the same PAX. Is this fair? Rarely. Saying the pax index is a work of fiction is only as true as pointing out how; /html/ba-autox/2000-03/msg00433.html (10,728 bytes)
10. RE: STS Class Supported in SFR (score: 1): Author: "Watson, Mark" <Mark.Watson@Schwab.COM>; Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 12:07:41 -0700; This clears everything up for marking your card, what about markings on the Now that we have added the STS class, we may want to make sure we have distinct Class markings on the cars, It is my assump; /html/ba-autox/2000-03/msg00440.html (10,109 bytes)
11. Re: STS Class Supported in SFR (score: 1): Author: Pat Kelly <lollipop@ricochet.net>; Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 11:34:39 -0800; They have enough time, even, to check the car color. :-) It's only when a car is poorly marked, or the card is poorly filled out (crummy handwriting), or incomplete information that problems arise. -; /html/ba-autox/2000-03/msg00444.html (10,703 bytes)
12. Re: STS Class Supported in SFR (score: 1): Author: "Jerry Mouton" <jerry@moutons.org>; Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 16:40:05 -0800; Confusing, isn't it? Here's the way it should be: ST - Street Touring, R tires STS - Street Touring S, street tires ST - R - Street Touring (Rookie) (PAX - .810) (everybody wears street tires) ST -; /html/ba-autox/2000-03/msg00454.html (11,436 bytes)
13. RE: STS Class Supported in SFR (score: 1): Author: Craig Boyle <craig_boyle@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 20:51:08 -0800 (PST); NO! Remember we decided if your a rookie you must take the STR pax. There isn't a really clean way to explain this to someone new. Perhaps the easiest way to do this is to to disallow STS for rookies; /html/ba-autox/2000-03/msg00457.html (10,377 bytes)
14. RE: STS Class Supported in SFR (score: 1): Author: Bill Martin <martin_93555@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2000 08:08:18 -0800 (PST); For what it's worth, from an SFR member way out on the frontier, I think supporting STS will work out well for you. I know you've had considerable rookie participation, and they're sometimes loath to; /html/ba-autox/2000-03/msg00470.html (8,476 bytes)
15. RE: STS Class Supported in SFR (score: 1): Author: "Watson, Mark" <Mark.Watson@Schwab.COM>; Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 10:59:20 -0700; I looks like ST and STS are growing here at the same rate. (or more) The 7th run group on Saturday was HUGE, if the numbers keep up, maybe we should consider splitting up ST and STS into different ru; /html/ba-autox/2000-03/msg00490.html (9,463 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]