OK, I've read through all the STU-related posts from the weekend, and it looks like we're down to two major items to solve: 1) Language for engine swaps (what is/is not allowed) 2) Displacement limit
<snip> I would humbly request that this be bumped up a little if we go with Prop. B. I would love to be able to campaign my 2.3L Turbo Ford in this class. Ford put these engines in the Mustang, Capri
I must be missing something, but I don't see how this excludes the M3, at least not the 3L version. What is the exact displacement of the 3.2L? Also, how many turbocharged Subarus are over 2.2L? None
i am curious and uninitiated, i just bought a '84 rx-7 i have ran it in one autocross so far, as csp. it has a racing beat 13b in it, is my daily driver, and has strut braces, tokiko shocks, sway bar
I have been told that there is a (large?) population of supercharged M3s that would like to play in this class. Proposal A allows them, Proposal B excludes them. Is that a good thing? *shrug* I can
For item 2, we have two good solutions. Either one is completely workable, the difference is which cars get included/excluded depending on which one we adopt. Proposal A is: Rotary : 1.500 litres OHC
3.152L But it does exclude a big market of _autocrossers_ -- not potential autox'ers, but active autox'ers -- turbo-charged and super-charged M3s who autox with the BMW CCA. They would love to also a
Something like this has been bouncing around my head for some time: - Take the STU rules as currently written on the website (http://autocross.dsm.org/stu.html) - Pull the eligibility language, but