Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SU\'s\s+vs\s+Webers\s+when\s+converting\s+a\s+rubbernose\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SU\'s\s+vs\s+Webers\s+when\s+converting\s+a\s+rubbernose\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. SU's vs Webers when converting a rubbernose (score: 1): Author: "Neil Cotty" <neilc@tradesrv.com.au>; Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1998 16:58:40 +1000; Hi all, I've read quite a bit lately on SU's, Webers etc and I'm not sure why there are so many people out there with rubbernose cars converting to a Weber when they could convert to SU's. As far as; /html/mgs/1998-11/msg01343.html (9,345 bytes)
2. Re: SU's vs Webers when converting a rubbernose (score: 1): Author: H4aardvrk@aol.com; Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1998 02:07:14 EST; << d like to hear some comments on this rubbernose issue >> neil, The dgv weber is a "modern carb"..it is easily tuned to poerate under a variety of real road conditions;different temps,different alt; /html/mgs/1998-11/msg01346.html (8,414 bytes)
3. Re: SU's vs Webers when converting a rubbernose (score: 1): Author: "William M. Gilroy" <wmgilroy@lucent.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1998 15:10:23 -0500; I think another issue is cost. I person can score a Weber and manifold for about $400-$450 while a new set of SU's is about $600. This is from memory so don't beat me up. If you are buying new the We; /html/mgs/1998-11/msg01368.html (8,681 bytes)
4. Re: SU's vs Webers when converting a rubbernose (score: 1): Author: Bill Saidel <saidel@crab.rutgers.edu>; Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1998 15:31:15 -0500; when Agreed...I bought a used but clean SU for $300 for my '76B which also included gasket kits, some of the accessories for mounting but no air filters which will be another $80 or so. Bill ** Dr. B; /html/mgs/1998-11/msg01370.html (9,445 bytes)
5. Re: SU's vs Webers when converting a rubbernose (score: 1): Author: "Mike Gigante" <mikeg@vicnet.net.au>; Date: Wed, 25 Nov 1998 09:17:34 -0800; Webers just sound so much better :-) In addition, unlike SUs, they are "set and forget" - they don't drift out of tune, and they are less prone to wear problems. If they are set up correctly, they ar; /html/mgs/1998-11/msg01374.html (11,026 bytes)
6. Re: SU's vs Webers when converting a rubbernose (score: 1): Author: Steven Tritle <stritle@epix.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1998 17:37:30 -0500; Sounds more like SU's than Webers.; /html/mgs/1998-11/msg01375.html (11,168 bytes)
7. Re: SU's vs Webers when converting a rubbernose (score: 1): Author: "bill" <pplusb@northlink.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1998 16:54:37 -0700; Agreed - can't bump an SU off once set properly. Also, they work better than Webers!! --Original Message-- From: Steven Tritle <stritle@epix.net> To: Mike Gigante <mikeg@vicnet.net.au>; mgs@autox.tea; /html/mgs/1998-11/msg01379.html (11,983 bytes)
8. Re: SU's vs Webers when converting a rubbernose (score: 1): Author: "Mike Gigante" <mikeg@vicnet.net.au>; Date: Wed, 25 Nov 1998 11:00:00 -0800; Well, that may be your experience, but it isn't mine. I have found the Webers bulletproof and truely 'set and forget', no more carb synchronisation, no more leaky throttle shafts, no more stuck float; /html/mgs/1998-11/msg01380.html (14,325 bytes)
9. Re: SU's vs Webers when converting a rubbernose (score: 1): Author: "Neil Cotty" <neilc@tradesrv.com.au>; Date: Wed, 25 Nov 1998 12:57:22 +1000; Really?? There's a place here in Sydney that has a lot of new SU stock ex factory. They charge around $450 AUD for a pair of HS4's not incl linkage (like $30), manifold and heat shield (erm $70). I; /html/mgs/1998-11/msg01384.html (10,171 bytes)
10. Re: SU's vs Webers when converting a rubbernose (score: 1): Author: gofastmg@juno.com (Rick Morrison); Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1998 23:23:46 EST; Sound's EXACTLY like my HIF's. The only advantage I can see for the Weber's is that you don't have to add oil periodically. This is worth $300???? :>) Rick Morrison 72 MGBGT 74 Midget On Tue, 24 Nov; /html/mgs/1998-11/msg01398.html (12,310 bytes)
11. Re: SU's vs Webers when converting a rubbernose (score: 1): Author: "Paul A. Tegler, Jr" <wizardz@amdyne.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1998 23:50:31 -0500; Hey Neil... give us the name/address/phone number/ of the place that has these inexpensive SU's PLEASE! --Original Message-- From: Neil Cotty <neilc@tradesrv.com.au> To: MG Mailing List (E-mail) <mgs; /html/mgs/1998-11/msg01404.html (11,045 bytes)
12. Re: SU's vs Webers when converting a rubbernose (score: 1): Author: "Scott Pontius" <spontius@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1998 21:14:02 -0800; I think it would really help clarify the debate on Weber vs SU if we could all be more specific about WHICH Weber we mean- There is a big difference between a single sidedraft Weber and a DGV Weber o; /html/mgs/1998-11/msg01405.html (13,961 bytes)
13. Re: SU's vs Webers when converting a rubbernose (score: 1): Author: Mgbreh@aol.com; Date: Wed, 25 Nov 1998 00:35:36 EST; AMEN ive only had to touch it after a valve job this summer Ray Huff 76 b weberized; /html/mgs/1998-11/msg01407.html (8,651 bytes)
14. Re: SU's vs Webers when converting a rubbernose (score: 1): Author: "Mike Gigante" <mikeg@vicnet.net.au>; Date: Wed, 25 Nov 1998 21:39:09 -0800; The HIF is an excellent carb, and a significant technical advance on the older style SU. For all around use (road) I'd be more than happy using a HIF. In fact I have used a HIF6 on a 1380cc spridget; /html/mgs/1998-11/msg01414.html (13,478 bytes)
15. Re: SU's vs Webers when converting a rubbernose (score: 1): Author: Neil Cotty <neilc@tradesrv.com.au>; Date: Thu, 26 Nov 1998 03:15:12 -0800; Paul & others, It's : Bill Brassington Midel Pty. Ltd. 4 Frazer Street Lakemba, NSW 2195 AUSTRALIA Ph: +61 2 9759 5598 Bill rebushed my carbs and supplied me with rebuild kits for my HS4's. Sorry I d; /html/mgs/1998-11/msg01429.html (9,600 bytes)
16. Re: SU's vs Webers when converting a rubbernose (score: 1): Author: H4aardvrk@aol.com; Date: Wed, 25 Nov 1998 16:12:24 EST; << The HIF is an excellent carb, and a significant technical advance on the >> MIke, I don't have a problem with most of the features of the HIF. There is one design feature that dosen't seem to do e; /html/mgs/1998-11/msg01444.html (9,354 bytes)
17. Re: SU's vs Webers when converting a rubbernose (score: 1): Author: gofastmg@juno.com (Rick Morrison); Date: Thu, 26 Nov 1998 20:33:35 EST; Hey Mike, I wasn't flaming you, just getting the point about SU's The HIF is a good carb, and I don't have a good excuse to get rid of mine. HS's have their share of problems, but in good condition,; /html/mgs/1998-11/msg01486.html (15,346 bytes)
18. Re: SU's vs Webers when converting a rubbernose (score: 1): Author: "Mike Gigante" <mikeg@vicnet.net.au>; Date: Fri, 27 Nov 1998 13:44:26 -0800; Don't worry Rick, I didn't take it as a flame. I do think there has been enough of this topic though! As a matter of course, I always use a rolling road dyno after each change - seat of the pants doe; /html/mgs/1998-11/msg01488.html (17,077 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]