Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SVRA\s+Points\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SVRA\s+Points\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. SVRA Points (score: 1): Author: Bahnseye@aol.com; Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 20:46:55 EDT; The new SVRA points schedule (It is not yet o their web site): Single car incident minor contact minor damage 3 points overdriving - no damage 3 overdriving - minor damage 6 overdriving - meidum dama; /html/vintage-race/1999-09/msg00306.html (8,197 bytes)
2. Re: SVRA Points (score: 1): Author: Simon Favre <simon@mondes.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 18:16:22 -0700; I've got it. Get a vintage cop car to play the pace car role! A '55 Ford Fairlane with a bubble gum machine on top would be perfect. ...; /html/vintage-race/1999-09/msg00308.html (7,584 bytes)
3. Re: SVRA Points (score: 1): Author: Russ Moore <rem9@cornell.edu>; Date: Sat, 25 Sep 1999 08:56:52 -0400; Looking at the big picture, if you would, it is a positive move for a sanctioning body to discourage wreckless behavior which places participants safety at risk as well as their cars. VARAC has disc; /html/vintage-race/1999-09/msg00312.html (10,021 bytes)
4. Re: SVRA Points (score: 1): Author: "Robert Alder" <alder_rj@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Sat, 25 Sep 1999 09:06:37 -0600; Lots of good discussion here. Keep it up. Our sport needs this open I couldn't agree more that strict discipline of racing attitudes is critical to the health of vintage racing, with the emphasis on; /html/vintage-race/1999-09/msg00314.html (9,975 bytes)
5. Re: SVRA Points (score: 1): Author: DonJQueen@aol.com; Date: Sat, 25 Sep 1999 14:14:26 EDT; << Now just for fun, let's think about just how subjectivethe words "overdriving", "minor", "medium", and "major"really are. I guess the committee will need to decide. It won't be too long before the; /html/vintage-race/1999-09/msg00315.html (8,574 bytes)
6. Re: SVRA Points (score: 1): Author: JWoesvra@aol.com; Date: Sat, 25 Sep 1999 15:36:56 EDT; << The new SVRA points schedule (It is not yet o their web site): >> Just a quick post to all: This points system has been used for over three years by SVRA. It is not new or different at all. It has; /html/vintage-race/1999-09/msg00317.html (8,029 bytes)
7. Re: SVRA Points (score: 1): Author: Bahnseye@aol.com; Date: Sat, 25 Sep 1999 20:39:07 EDT; Did you mean this? << to discourage wreckless behavior >> or perhaps reckless. . . Seriously, though, racing is an aggressive,competitive sport. Is this another well intended but invasive attempt to; /html/vintage-race/1999-09/msg00320.html (8,161 bytes)
8. Re: SVRA Points (score: 1): Author: "Greg Solow" <gregmogdoc@surfnetusa.com>; Date: Sat, 25 Sep 1999 19:11:52 -0700; I would certainly be enclined to classify a spin as overdriving. I have been racing since 1979, over 60 events, usually finish in the top 10 running against cars that should by all rights be in a cla; /html/vintage-race/1999-09/msg00321.html (9,936 bytes)
9. Re: SVRA Points (score: 1): Author: S800Racer@aol.com; Date: Sat, 25 Sep 1999 23:00:50 EDT; <<We've found it is better to simply let everyone know the broad perimeters of acceptable behavior and then make damn sure that the stewarding process is highly visible, consistent, very prompt, and; /html/vintage-race/1999-09/msg00325.html (8,842 bytes)
10. Re: SVRA Points (score: 1): Author: S800Racer@aol.com; Date: Sat, 25 Sep 1999 23:36:49 EDT; <<I would certainly be enclined to classify a spin as overdriving.>> 100% agreed. There are some who advocate the position that you can't find the edge of the envelope if you don't spin sometime. Thi; /html/vintage-race/1999-09/msg00326.html (9,128 bytes)
11. Re: SVRA Points (score: 1): Author: "Jim & Ann Brown" <thebrowns@pdq.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Sep 1999 23:23:14 -0500; In case you intended your question to be rhetorical, I will bite anyway, and publish for all to read that in my opinion both a spin and two off, standing alone, are without any question "overdriving; /html/vintage-race/1999-09/msg00328.html (9,081 bytes)
12. Re: SVRA Points (score: 1): Author: "Greg Solow" <gregmogdoc@surfnetusa.com>; Date: Sun, 26 Sep 1999 01:12:07 -0700; I have to disagree about the "two off" and even "four off" Racing is about pushing the envelope. To plush the envelope it is necessary to explore the limits. It is very possible to maintain control a; /html/vintage-race/1999-09/msg00329.html (10,107 bytes)
13. Re: SVRA Points (score: 1): Author: Rick Snover <rsnover@toyshop-resto.com>; Date: Sun, 26 Sep 1999 10:00:15 -0700; <QUIBLE> I'd think that wreckless behavior would be encouraged. It's reckless behavior that is dangerous ;-) </QUIBLE> -- Rick Snover, San Diego, CA Toy Shop Restorations - http://www.toyshop-resto.; /html/vintage-race/1999-09/msg00332.html (8,113 bytes)
14. Re: SVRA Points (score: 1): Author: "Greg Solow" <Gregmogdoc@surfnetusa.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 18:13:28 -0700; By my standards, an 8 point "overdriving- medium damage" incident ought to be worth a 13 month suspension. especially if the damage is caused to my car by someone else's "overdriving" decide. in writ; /html/vintage-race/1999-09/msg00351.html (9,298 bytes)
15. Re: SVRA Points (score: 1): Author: Tom M <tmatycho@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 22:18:13 -0700; Theoretically points deductions are good, but they fail the immediacy requirement. I recall last spring's driver's meeting at the CSRG T-hill event, where someone in high dudgeon held a yellow tablet; /html/vintage-race/1999-09/msg00357.html (9,109 bytes)
16. Re: SVRA Points (score: 1): Author: "Mark Palmer" <mgvrmark@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 15:24:03 PDT; Greg & group, I agree. I feel SVRA's point system is too lenient. They went in the wrong direction when they adopted it a few years ago, in my opinion. It seems inconsistent with the 13/13 rule. I un; /html/vintage-race/1999-09/msg00363.html (10,559 bytes)
17. Re: SVRA Points (score: 1): Author: Jackson Zimmermann <JZIMMERM@exch.co.albemarle.va.us>; Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 10:51:03 -0400; I must first preface my statements on this issue with some comments regarding my perspective. I have been attending vintage events as a spectator for nearly 15 years. I am not a competitor in Vintage; /html/vintage-race/1999-09/msg00388.html (11,413 bytes)
18. RE: SVRA Points (score: 1): Author: psr@mnw.net (PSR); Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 08:35:54 -0500; I'll interrupt this thread at this point because the clear differences of opinion, just on this one incident, serve to illustrate precisely the reason why SVRA has a points system. SVRA's 3-driver co; /html/vintage-race/1999-09/msg00410.html (9,929 bytes)
19. RE: SVRA Points (score: 1): Author: "Mark Palmer" <mgvrmark@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 07:46:40 PDT; BTW, the incident I described was not at an SVRA event, it was a different vintage organization. Mark; /html/vintage-race/1999-09/msg00412.html (10,933 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 19
Page: [1]