Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Say\s+No\s+to\s+Camber\s+Kits\s+$was\:\s+Costs\s+in\s+General$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Say\s+No\s+to\s+Camber\s+Kits\s+$was\:\s+Costs\s+in\s+General$\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Say No to Camber Kits (was: Costs in General) (score: 1): Author: Erik Van-der-Mey <autox@webcentrix.net>; Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 10:39:56 -0500; And my Neon IS classed appropriately. The whole argument/discussion to "allow camber modification on cars that don't have it" is the solo equivalent of "trunk kits" for showroom stock road racing...; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00616.html (7,933 bytes)
2. Re: Say No to Camber Kits (was: Costs in General) (score: 1): Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>; Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 17:34:27 -0700; Uh, Erik, that was a non-list reply to you - notice? Luckily for me a rarely send things I would be embarrassed about :-) If you re-read all my stuff you will find me in favor of no options in a pure; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00667.html (8,272 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]