Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Seat\s+Belt\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Seat\s+Belt\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Seat Belt (score: 1): Author: "David Macedonia" <david.macedonia@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 23:21:14 -0400; What seat belts do you recommend for my 1966 MGB? It's configured for a 3-point belt (mounting points on the transmission tunnel, inner sill and rear wheel arch) with the inertial reel is mounted on; /html/mgs/2004-09/msg00071.html (7,444 bytes)
2. Re: Seat Belt (score: 1): Author: Carl French <leylandauto@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 05:38:42 -0700 (PDT); Her are two options from Moss that would be relatively correct for the 66 and still give you the safety for you. Carl French http://www.mossmotors.com/Shop/ViewProducts.aspx?PlateIndexID=32426&SortOr; /html/mgs/2004-09/msg00072.html (7,862 bytes)
3. Re: Seat Belt (score: 1): Author: Paul Root <ptroot@iaces.com>; Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 08:21:46 -0500; I replaced the 3 point belts with the Moss inertia reel belts (373-775) and like them. They wouldn't be period correct for a '66, but they work well. I do need to adjust them a bit, as my boys pull o; /html/mgs/2004-09/msg00074.html (8,299 bytes)
4. Re: Seat Belt (score: 1): Author: RW <prndl@pacbell.net>; Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 09:10:07 -0700; I bought the Moss 3-point belts for my '67 and they didn't work very well. Because the anchorage for the shoulder belt is designed to hang vertically from the B pillar in "normal" application, it do; /html/mgs/2004-09/msg00084.html (8,614 bytes)
5. Re: Seat Belt (score: 1): Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 09:04:35 +0100; Is this with the bracket to orientate the reel so that its spindle is horizontal? I've had inertias on my wheel arches for 14 years and never had a problem with them loosening. The reel keeps tension; /html/mgs/2004-09/msg00099.html (8,089 bytes)
6. Re: Seat Belt (score: 1): Author: RW <prndl@pacbell.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 06:22:03 -0700; Paul, No, my experience is only with the non-inertia, manual style belts. I kludged the problem by clipping a small, 2" plastic bar clip across the belts near the back mounting point. That stopped t; /html/mgs/2004-09/msg00104.html (7,324 bytes)
7. Re: Seat Belt (score: 1): Author: "David Macedonia" <david.macedonia@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 20:21:52 -0400; Are you sure about that part number? 373-775? I can't find it in the catalog or Moss' website. -Dave 66 and still give you the safety for you. http://www.mossmotors.com/Shop/ViewProducts.aspx?PlateI; /html/mgs/2004-09/msg00108.html (9,129 bytes)
8. Re: Seat Belt (score: 1): Author: Paul Root <ptroot@iaces.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 20:00:56 -0500; I'm absolutely sure that's the wrong number. It's nowhere close! I must have had a worse day than I thought yesterday! :-) I got a lot wrong in emails. The right number is 222-025. http://www.mossmot; /html/mgs/2004-09/msg00109.html (9,498 bytes)
9. Re: Seat Belt (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 11:26:39 -0700; Hmmm, all I can say is that is not a original configuration. 66 would have lap belts without an inertia reel. I suspect the combination of the wheel arch mount and the low-back seat would not make fo; /html/mgs/2004-09/msg00112.html (8,079 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]