Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Sebring\s+valance\,\s+Part\s+1\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Sebring\s+valance\,\s+Part\s+1\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Sebring valance, Part 1 (score: 1): Author: "Paul M." <rowman22001@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 21:06:35 -0700 (PDT); I promised a blow-by-blow of my experience fitting Sebring valances to my MGB, and although things were delayed a bit while I moved, I am finally able to make good on that promise. The front valance; /html/mgs/2003-07/msg00634.html (11,550 bytes)
2. RE: Sebring valance, Part 1 (score: 1): Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 09:30:47 -0700; Thanks for all the detail. The ambivalent comment in the catalog happened because we were getting two different brands of valence from Moss UK. I've been trying to get this sorted out. I'd like to g; /html/mgs/2003-07/msg00670.html (8,356 bytes)
3. RE: Sebring valance, Part 1 (score: 1): Author: "Paul M." <rowman22001@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 12:22:16 -0700 (PDT); Here are a couple of the photos, but the rest are still in the camera... www.sopwithracing.com/sebring.htm == Paul Misencik 1971 MGB Vintage Race Project www.sopwithracing.com Huntersville, NC USA ww; /html/mgs/2003-07/msg00674.html (8,002 bytes)
4. Re: Sebring valance, Part 1 (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 13:08:55 -0700; The valance looks great (good job), but whenever I see that particular grill on an MGB (I believe it's 71-72), I get the urge to grind off the "badge bulge" on the front of the bonnet. It's a good-lo; /html/mgs/2003-07/msg00675.html (8,620 bytes)
5. Re: Sebring valance, Part 1 (score: 1): Author: "Paul M." <rowman22001@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 14:49:25 -0700 (PDT); Yeah, I agree. What gives with that? I mean, they never stuck a badge up there or anything... was it just there to integrate more smoothly into the original grille structure? On a sorta related note; /html/mgs/2003-07/msg00676.html (9,203 bytes)
6. Re: Sebring valance, Part 1 (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 15:25:08 -0700; Well, if you look at the original "as God and Abingdon intended" 63-69 grill, you see that the badge fits neatly into this bump, the whole arrangement subtly evoking the classic MG radiator shell. Wh; /html/mgs/2003-07/msg00679.html (10,294 bytes)
7. Re: Sebring valance, Part 1 (score: 1): Author: "Paul M." <rowman22001@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 15:57:32 -0700 (PDT); No, I meant the entire height of all the vertical slats, because all the chrome is already gone. But your mention of an aluminum eggcrate grill is a good one, even if it ultimately ends up being bla; /html/mgs/2003-07/msg00680.html (8,684 bytes)
8. Re: Sebring valance, Part 1 (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Fayne" <fayne@attglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 18:51:35 -0500; Nice job, gives a whole new look to the 'B. I came across this webpage highlighting a '78 that was given a modern day look. I'm sticking with the chrome goodies, but this really freshens the look of; /html/mgs/2003-07/msg00682.html (8,589 bytes)
9. Re: Sebring valance, Part 1 (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 17:38:00 -0700; I've seen 4 x 8 metal eggcrates as ceiling panels for fluorescent lighting. And at the local scrap dealer (Allen Steel in Redwood City) I have run across all kinds of meshes and grill-like structures; /html/mgs/2003-07/msg00683.html (8,971 bytes)
10. Re: Sebring valance, Part 1 (score: 1): Author: Dan DiBiase <d_dibiase@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 17:43:38 -0700 (PDT); Pretty sharp, and I love the color.... == Dan The Garden State '76 MGB Tourer (Driver) '65 MGB Tourer (Project) NAMGBR #5-2328 http://mywebpages.comcast.net/dibiase/Working_MG_Gallery.html __________; /html/mgs/2003-07/msg00684.html (8,803 bytes)
11. Re: Sebring valance, Part 1 (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 17:49:29 -0700; That is a pretty car. I think it looks better than the RV8 since it lacks the heavy bumpers and the clumsy fender flares. Too bad it's an automatic. -- Max Heim '66 MGB GHN3L76149 If you're near Moun; /html/mgs/2003-07/msg00685.html (8,598 bytes)
12. Re: Sebring valance, Part 1 (score: 1): Author: "Paul M." <rowman22001@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 18:59:06 -0700 (PDT); Okay, no one is allowed to bad-mouth the Sport Compact car guys ever again! Why? I asked where to find aluminum "egg crate" before searching thoroughly on Google. Thanks to the millions of customizin; /html/mgs/2003-07/msg00688.html (8,920 bytes)
13. Re: Sebring valance, Part 1 (score: 1): Author: Paul Root <proot@iaces.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 09:30:18 -0500; Same reason for every change in the MG. No money. I know it's heracy, but my favorite grill is the 73-74. I like the black honeycomb surrounded by chrome. The early is just too much chrome for me. Of; /html/mgs/2003-07/msg00699.html (9,083 bytes)
14. Re: Sebring valance, Part 1 (score: 1): Author: "Telewest $PH$" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 16:02:18 +0100; You'd never fit behind the rad ... /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive; /html/mgs/2003-07/msg00701.html (7,971 bytes)
15. Re: Sebring valance, Part 1 (score: 1): Author: "Paul M." <rowman22001@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 09:30:04 -0700 (PDT); Correctamundo. I've had a couple of posts asking me about the legality of running on the street with no front bumper, and I don't have an answer for that yet. My guess is that it's technically not l; /html/mgs/2003-07/msg00703.html (9,589 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]